...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug research >Bioequivalence studies for 2 different strengths of irbesartan/ hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy volunteers: 300/25 mg and 300/125 mg film-coated tablets
【24h】

Bioequivalence studies for 2 different strengths of irbesartan/ hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy volunteers: 300/25 mg and 300/125 mg film-coated tablets

机译:健康志愿者中两种不同强度的厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪组合的生物等效性研究:300/25 mg和300/125 mg薄膜衣片

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two bioequivalence studies of irbesartan (CAS 138402-11-6) and hydrochlorothiazide (CAS 58-93-5) combination at 300/12.5 mg and 300/25 mg strengths were carried out in order to assess the bioequivalence of these film-coated tablet formulations in comparison with the marketed reference formulations. Both studies were performed with 30 healthy volunteers according to an open label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover, single dose and fasting conditions design. In each study, test and reference formulations were administered in 2 treatment days, separated by a washout period of 7 days. Blood samples were drawn up to 72 h following drug administration in case of irbesartan and up to 24 h in case of hydrochlorothiazide. Plasma concentrations of both analytes were obtained by a validated HPLC method using MS/MS detection. Log-transformed AUC0-t and Cmax values were tested for bioequivalence based on the ratios of the geometric LSmeans (test/reference). For both studies, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric LSmean values for the test/reference ratios for AUC0-t [(irbesartan: 300/12.5 mgstrength: 95.33-111.74%. 300/25 mg strength: 91.27-103.93%) (hydrochlorothiazide: 300/12.5 mg strength: 99.63-107.50%. 300/25 mg strength: 95.72-102.24%)] and Cmax [(irbesartan: 300/12.5 mg strength: 98.73-115.03%. 300/25 mg strength: 97.27-112.12%) (hydrochlorothiazide: 300/12.5 mg strength: 97.34-112.06%. 300/25 mg strength: 93.29-106.38%)] were within the bio-equivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. According to the European Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence it may be therefore concluded that both test formulations are bioequivalent to the corresponding reference formulations. Overall, it was judged that both studies were conducted with a good tolerance of the subjects to study drugs.
机译:分别对强度为300 / 12.5 mg和300/25 mg的厄贝沙坦(CAS 138402-11-6)和氢氯噻嗪(CAS 58-93-5)组合进行了两项生物等效性研究,以评估这些薄膜衣片的生物等效性配方与市售参考配方相比。两项研究均根据开放标签,随机,2期,2序列,交叉,单剂量和禁食条件设计,与30名健康志愿者进行。在每项研究中,测试和参考配方均在2个治疗日内给药,间隔7天。在服用厄贝沙坦的情况下,在给药后长达72小时抽取血样,在服用氢氯噻嗪的情况下则抽取24小时血样。两种分析物的血浆浓度均通过使用MS / MS检测的有效HPLC方法获得。对数转换的AUC0-t和Cmax值基于几何LSmeans的比率(测试/参考)进行了生物等效性测试。对于这两项研究,几何LSmean值对于AUC0-t的测试/参考比的90%置信区间[(厄贝沙坦:300 / 12.5毫克强度:95.33-111.74%。300/25毫克强度:91.27-103.93%)(氢氯噻嗪:300 / 12.5 mg强度:99.63-107.50%。300/25 mg强度:95.72-102.24%)]和​​Cmax [(厄贝沙坦:300 / 12.5 mg强度:98.73-115.03%。300/25 mg强度:97.27- 112.12%)(氢氯噻嗪:300 / 12.5 mg强度:97.34-112.06%。300/25 mg强度:93.29-106.38%)]在生物等效性接受范围80-125%内。因此,根据《欧洲生物等效性研究指南》,可以得出以下结论:两种测试制剂均与相应的参考制剂具有生物等效性。总体而言,据判断,两项研究均对受试者学习药物具有良好的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号