首页> 外文期刊>Drugs: International Journal of Current Therapeutics and Applied Pharmacology Reviews, Featuring Evaluations on New Drugs, Review Articles on Drugs and Drug Therapy, and Drug Literature Abstracts >Liposomal amphotericin B: a review of its use as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.
【24h】

Liposomal amphotericin B: a review of its use as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.

机译:脂质体两性霉素B:在热性中性粒细胞减少症和侵袭性真菌感染的治疗中作为经验疗法的综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) is a lipid-associated formulation of the broad-spectrum polyene antifungal agent amphotericin B. It is active against clinically relevant yeasts and moulds, including Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. and filamentous moulds such as Zygomycetes, and is approved for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in many countries worldwide. It was developed to improve the tolerability profile of amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was for many decades considered the gold standard of antifungal treatment, despite being associated with infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity. In well controlled trials, liposomal amphotericin B had similar efficacy to amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex as empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients with febrile neutropenia. In addition, caspofungin was noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. For the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections, liposomal amphotericin B was more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment in patients with disseminated histoplasmosis and AIDS, and was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate in patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis and AIDS. In adults, micafungin was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. Data from animal studies suggested that higher dosages of liposomal amphotericin B might improve efficacy; however, in the AmBiLoad trial in patients with invasive mould infection, there was no statistical difference in efficacy between the standard dosage of liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day and a higher 10 mg/kg/day dosage, although the standard dosage was better tolerated. Despite being associated with fewer infusion-related adverse events and less nephrotoxicity than amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex, liposomal amphotericin B use is still limited to some extent by these adverse events. Both echinocandins were better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B. The cost of liposomal amphotericin B therapy may also restrict its use, but further pharmacoeconomic studies are required to fully define its cost effectiveness compared with other antifungal agents. Based on comparative data from well controlled trials, extensive clinical experience and its broad spectrum of activity, liposomal amphotericin B remains a first-line option for empirical therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia and in those with disseminated histoplasmosis, and is an option for the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis, and for invasive Candida spp. or Aspergillus spp. infections. Amphotericin B, a macrocyclic, polyene antifungal agent, is thought to act by binding to ergosterol, the principal sterol in fungal cell membranes and Leishmania cells. This results in a change in membrane permeability, causing metabolic disturbance, leakage of small molecules and, as a consequence, cell death. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that liposomal amphotericin B remains closely associated with the liposomes in the circulation, thereby reducing the potential for nephrotoxicity and infusion-related toxicity associated with conventional amphotericin B. Amphotericin B shows very good in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant fungal isolates, including most strains of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., and other filamentous fungi such as Zygomycetes. Liposomal amphotericin B has proven effective in various animal models of fungal infections, including those for candidiasis, aspergillosis, fusariosis and zygomycosis. Liposomal amphotericin B also shows immunomodulatory effects, although the mechanisms involved are not fully understood, and differ from those of amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion. In adult patients with febrile neutropenia, intravenous liposomal amphotericin B has nonli
机译:脂质体两性霉素B(AmBisome)是广谱多烯抗真菌剂两性霉素B的脂质相关制剂。它对临床相关的酵母和霉菌具有活性,包括念珠菌属,曲霉属。和丝状霉菌,例如合酵母,并且已被批准用于治疗全球许多国家的侵袭性真菌感染。它的开发是为了改善两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐的耐受性,尽管与输注相关的事件和肾毒性相关联,但数十年来一直被认为是抗真菌治疗的金标准。在对照试验中,成人和小儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验疗法与两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐和两性霉素B脂质复合物的疗效相似。此外,卡泊芬净在成年发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的经验治疗中不亚于脂质体两性霉素B。对于已确诊的侵袭性真菌感染,在弥漫性组织胞浆菌病和艾滋病患者中,脂质体两性霉素B比两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐治疗更有效,并且在急性隐球菌性脑膜炎和艾滋病患者中不亚于两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐。在成年人中,米卡芬净在治疗念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌病方面不逊于脂质体两性霉素B。来自动物研究的数据表明,更高剂量的脂质体两性霉素B可能会提高疗效;但是,在针对侵袭性霉菌感染患者的AmBiLoad试验中,标准剂量的脂质体两性霉素B 3 mg / kg /天和较高的10 mg / kg /天剂量之间,疗效没有统计学差异。耐受性更好。尽管与两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐和两性霉素B脂质复合物相比,与输注相关的不良事件较少且肾毒性较小,但脂质体两性霉素B的使用仍在一定程度上受到这些不良事件的限制。两种棘霉素都比脂质体两性霉素B耐受性更好。脂质体两性霉素B治疗的费用也可能限制了其使用,但与其他抗真菌药相比,需要进一步的药物经济学研究以充分确定其成本有效性。基于对照试验的比较数据,广泛的临床经验及其广泛的活性,脂质体两性霉素B仍然是高热性中性粒细胞减少症和弥漫性组织胞浆病患者经验疗法的一线选择,并且是治疗的选择与艾滋病相关的隐球菌性脑膜炎和侵袭性念珠菌属。或曲霉属感染。两性霉素B是一种大环多烯抗真菌剂,被认为通过与麦角固醇(真菌细胞膜和利什曼原虫细胞中的主要固醇)结合而起作用。这导致膜通透性的变化,引起代谢紊乱,小分子的泄漏并因此导致细胞死亡。体外和体内研究表明,脂质体两性霉素B在循环中仍与脂质体紧密结合,从而降低了与传统两性霉素B相关的肾毒性和与输注相关的毒性。两性霉素B对广泛的两性霉素具有非常好的体外活性临床相关真菌分离物的广谱,包括大多数念珠菌属菌株。和曲霉属,以及其他丝状真菌,如合酵母。脂质体两性霉素B已被证明可在各种真菌感染动物模型中有效,包括念珠菌病,曲霉病,镰刀菌病和合子菌病。脂质体两性霉素B也显示出免疫调节作用,尽管所涉及的机制尚未完全了解,并且不同于两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐和两性霉素B胶体分散体。在成年发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中,静脉注射脂质体两性霉素B会

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号