首页> 外文期刊>Drugs: education, prevention, and policy >Drug courts: Conceptual foundation, empirical findings, and policy implications
【24h】

Drug courts: Conceptual foundation, empirical findings, and policy implications

机译:毒品法庭:概念基础,经验结果和政策含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

While drug courts have emerged on the criminal justice policy-making agenda with considerable fanfare in recent years, they have now reached the point in their operational advancement and political advocacy where continued growth and development are becoming more dependent on the strength of empirical evidence. Along with insights obtained from descriptions related to the history and function of drug courts, their divergence from traditional judicial practices, and their role in the new paradigm of therapeutic jurisprudence, this article analyzes the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the drug court evaluation literature. From a public policy perspective, these empirical assessments are considered in conjunction with the conceptual foundations and implementation strategies associated with contemporary drug courts, in an effort to address their future potential to maintain a prominent position on the public policy agenda. As with similar public initiatives, it is argued that the long-term survival of drug courts can be strengthened to the extent that they are based on theory that is solidly anchored to policy, policy to practice, and, ultimately, practice to evidence-based outcomes.
机译:近年来,虽然毒品法庭在刑事司法政策制定议程中倍受赞誉,但在业务发展和政治主张方面已经达到了关键点,持续增长和发展越来越依赖经验证据。除了从与毒品法院的历史和职能,与传统司法实践的背离以及它们在治疗法学的新范式中的描述有关的描述中获得的见解之外,本文还分析了毒品法院的系统审查和荟萃分析的结果评价文献。从公共政策的角度来看,这些经验评估是与当代毒品法院相关的概念基础和实施策略一起考虑的,目的是要发挥其未来潜力,以在公共政策议程上保持重要地位。与类似的公共举措一样,有人认为,只要基于牢固扎根于政策的理论,实践政策以及最终基于证据的实践,毒品法庭的长期生存就可以得到加强。结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号