首页> 外文期刊>Drug and alcohol review >The Cannabis Infringement Notice scheme in Western Australia: a review of policy, police and judicial perspectives.
【24h】

The Cannabis Infringement Notice scheme in Western Australia: a review of policy, police and judicial perspectives.

机译:西澳大利亚州的《大麻侵权通知制度》:政策,警察和司法观点的审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Western Australia (WA) became the fourth Australian jurisdiction to adopt a 'prohibition with civil penalties scheme' for minor cannabis offences when its Cannabis Infringement Notice (CIN) scheme became law on 22 March 2004. This study examined the attitudes and practices of policy makers, members of the law enforcement and magistracy and other judicial sectors involved in enforcing the new scheme, and their views as to its likely impact on the drug market. As part of the pre--post evaluation of the legislative reforms a sample of 30 police, other criminal justice personnel and policy makers have been qualitatively interviewed. Data were collected both at the pre-implementation stage (March and June 2003) and shortly after the Act became operational (mid-June 2004). The Western Australia Police Service's implementation of the CIN scheme has been extremely professional. However, these early results suggest that while the CIN scheme has been designed to take into account problems with similar schemes elsewhere in Australia, possible problems include: some operational police being unsure about the operation of the scheme; expected savings in police resources will probably be reduced by procedures which require offenders to be taken back to the station rather than issue notices on the spot as intended by the scheme's architects; probable net widening; problems with exercise of police discretion to issue a CIN; and public misunderstanding of the scheme. In the early months of the scheme understanding of the new laws among both police and members of the public was far from perfect. For the system to achieve the outcomes intended by legislators, it is essential that levels of understanding improve. Media and other campaigns to inform the public that cannabis cultivation and use remain illegal, and to warn about risks associated with cannabis use, should be extended. As it will be at least 18 months before the scheme is operationally settled in, the media and others should be cautious about reading too much into police data on numbers of notices issued and on rates of compliance.
机译:西澳大利亚州(WA)在2004年3月22日将其大麻侵权通知(CIN)计划定为法律后,成为对轻度大麻犯罪采用“禁止民事处罚计划”的第四个澳大利亚辖区。本研究研究了政策制定者的态度和做法,参与执行新计划的执法和裁判官以及其他司法部门的成员,以及他们对该计划可能对毒品市场的影响的看法。作为对立法改革的事前评估的一部分,对30名警察,其他刑事司法人员和政策制定者进行了定性采访。该法案实施前(2003年3月和2003年6月)和该法案生效后不久(2004年6月中旬)都收集了数据。西澳大利亚州警察局对CIN计划的实施非常专业。但是,这些早期结果表明,尽管CIN计划的设计考虑到了澳大利亚其他地区类似计划的问题,但可能的问题包括:一些行动警察不确定该计划的运作;程序中要求将违法者带回派出所,而不是按计划的设计者的意愿在现场发出通知,程序可能会减少预期的警察资源节省;可能的净拓宽;行使警察酌情权签发CIN的问题;以及公众对该计划的误解。在该计划的最初几个月,警察和公众对新法律的了解还远远不够。为了使系统达到立法者预期的结果,提高理解水平至关重要。应当扩大媒体和其他活动,告知公众大麻种植和使用仍然是非法的,并警告与大麻使用有关的风险。由于该计划至少要在18个月内付诸实施,媒体和其他方面应谨慎对待,过多地将有关签发通知的数量和遵守率的信息读入警方数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号