...
首页> 外文期刊>DMW: Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift >Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis
【24h】

Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis

机译:比较常规和经鼻食管胃十二指肠镜常规诊断的前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Transnasal gastroscopy (TNG) is the result of ongoing improvements in endoscopic device development. These ultrathin endoscopes are planned to improve patient satisfaction with the endoscopic procedure. AIM: The aim of the current study was to prospectively evaluate the performance and patient acceptance of transnasal gastroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients (40 males, 23 females, mean age 58.5 years) referred for routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to our tertiary care referral centre were assigned to one of three groups: first time transnasal gastroscopy (group 1, TNG), first time transoral gastroscopy (group 2, TOG) and transnasal gastroscopy after a previous unsedated transoral gastroscopy (group 3). All examinations were performed without intravenous sedation. Patients answered a standardised questionnaire immediately following the examination. RESULTS: The three groups of patients did not differ in age, gender or reason for gastroscopy. Investigationsperformed using transnasal technique were significantly shorter (TNG 8.9 min and 9.2 min vs. TOG 11.9 min, p = 0.011 and p = 0.026, respectively) than those performed in transoral technique. Nosebleeding, albeit not clinically significant, and the urge to wretch were significantly more common in the transnasal technique group (p > 0.001). Patient acceptance tended to score higher in the transnasal technique groups, however not statistically higher. A greater number of patients from group 3 (TNG after previous TOG) would prefer a repeat exam via the transnasal route. CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal gastroscopy represents a possible alternative to the conventional transoral technique. TNG entails less subjective patient discomfort, and patients experienced in both techniques prefer the transnasal route. Shorter examination times and lack of intravenous sedation result in several benefits: no sedation-related complications, shorter post-procedure observation times, and subsequently shorter time off work for patients.
机译:简介:经鼻胃镜检查(TNG)是内窥镜设备开发方面不断改进的结果。这些超薄内窥镜计划用于提高患者对内窥镜检查程序的满意度。目的:本研究的目的是前瞻性评估经鼻胃镜检查的性能和患者接受度。患者与方法:连续63例常规上消化道内窥镜检查转诊至我们的三级医疗转诊中心的患者(40例男性,23例女性,平均年龄58.5岁)被分为以下三组之一:首次经鼻胃镜检查(第1组,TNG) ),第一次经口胃镜检查(第2组,TOG)和先前未镇静的经口胃镜检查(第3组)后经鼻胃镜检查。所有检查均未进行静脉镇静。患者在检查后立即回答了标准问卷。结果:三组患者的年龄,性别或胃镜检查的原因均无差异。与经口技术相比,经鼻技术进行的研究明显更短(TNG 8.9 min和9.2 min相对于TOG 11.9 min,p = 0.011和p = 0.026)。经鼻技术组虽然没有临床意义,但流鼻血和皱的欲望明显更为普遍(p> 0.001)。在经鼻技术组中,患者的接受度倾向于得分更高,但是在统计学上却没有更高。来自第3组的更多患者(在先前的TOG之后为TNG)更希望通过鼻腔途径进行重复检查。结论:经鼻胃镜检查是替代传统经口技术的一种可能。 TNG带来的患者不适感较小,并且使用这两种技术的患者都更喜欢经鼻途径。较短的检查时间和缺乏静脉镇静剂可带来多种好处:无与镇静有关的并发症,较短的手术后观察时间以及相应的患者下班时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号