...
首页> 外文期刊>Dimensions of critical care nursing: DCCN >A Pilot Study: Comparison of Arm Versus Ankle Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement at 2 Different Levels of Backrest Elevation
【24h】

A Pilot Study: Comparison of Arm Versus Ankle Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement at 2 Different Levels of Backrest Elevation

机译:一项初步研究:在2种不同水平的靠背抬高情况下手臂与踝关节无创血压测量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Standard practice for obtaining noninvasive blood pressure includes arm blood pressure (BP) cuff placement at the level of the heart; however, some critical care patients cannot have BPs taken in their arm because of various conditions, and ankle BPs are frequently used as substitutes. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if there was a significant variation between upper arm and ankle BP measurements at different backrest elevations with consideration of peripheral edema factors. Methodology: After institutional review board approval was obtained, a pilot study was implemented to evaluate noninvasive BP measurements of the arm and ankle with backrest elevation at 0° and 30° in a population of medical intensive care unit patients. Participants served as their own controls and were randomly assigned to left- versus right-side BP readings. Data were also collected on presence of arm versus ankle edema. Results: A total of 30 participants enrolled in the study and provided 120 BP measurements. Blood pressure readings were analyzed in terms of diastolic and systolic findings as well as backrest elevations and edema presence. Thirteen participants presented with either arm or ankle edema. There was a statistical difference between the systolic arm and ankle BP measurements in the 0° (P = .008) and 30° (P <.001) backrest elevation positions. The correlation between arm and ankle diastolic BP is greater for participants without ankle edema (P = .038, r = 0.54) than for participants with ankle edema (P = .650, r = 0.14), but it is not statistically significant (P = .47). Discussion: Even though ankle BPs are often substituted for arm BPs when the arm is unable to be used, ankle BPs and arm BPs are not interchangeable. Adjustments in backrest elevation and considerations of edema do not normalize the differences. Blood pressures obtained from the ankle are significantly greater than those obtained from the arm. This information needs to be considered when arms are not available and legs are used as surrogates for the upper arm.
机译:背景:获取无创血压的标准做法包括将手臂血压(BP)袖带置于心脏水平;但是,一些重症监护患者由于各种条件而无法在手臂上服用BP,因此经常将踝关节BP用作替代品。目的:本研究的目的是在考虑到周围水肿因素的情况下,确定在不同的靠背高度下,上臂和踝部血压测量值之间是否存在显着差异。方法:在获得机构审查委员会批准后,进行了一项初步研究,以评估重症监护病房患者在0°和30°时背靠抬高的手臂和踝关节的无创BP测量。参加者作为他们自己的对照,被随机分配到左侧和右侧血压读数。还收集了关于手臂水肿与脚踝水肿的数据。结果:共有30名参与者参加了研究,并提供了120次BP测量。根据舒张期和收缩期发现以及靠背升高和浮肿的存在来分析血压读数。 13名参与者出现手臂或踝部水肿。在0°(P = .008)和30°(P <.001)靠背仰角位置,收缩臂和踝部BP的测量值之间存在统计学差异。没有踝部水肿的参与者(P = .038,r = 0.54)的手臂和踝部舒张压BP的相关性大于患有踝部水肿的参与者(P = .650,r = 0.14),但无统计学意义(P = 0.47)。讨论:即使在无法使用手臂时,通常用脚腕BP代替手臂BP,但脚腕BP和手臂BP不可互换。靠背抬高的调整和水肿的考虑不能使差异正常化。从脚踝获得的血压明显高于从手臂获得的血压。当手臂不可用并且腿部用作上臂的代用品时,需要考虑此信息。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号