...
首页> 外文期刊>Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice >Aid in the midst of plenty: oil wealth, misery and advocacy in angola.
【24h】

Aid in the midst of plenty: oil wealth, misery and advocacy in angola.

机译:在充足的情况下提供援助:石油财富,安哥拉的苦难和倡导。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines advocacy initiatives by humanitarian and human rights organisations to address problems of governance in resource-rich and conflict-affected countries, focussing on the case of Angola. Humanitarian principles preclude the use of indiscriminate conditionality and point towards a cautious approach to advocacy aimed at assisting vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the relatively insignificant amount of aid supplied to resource-rich local authorities means that individual agencies have precious little leverage, especially when commercial interests rather than humanitarian or 'good governance' principles influence the priorities of bilateral donors. A context of resource wealth calls for: high levels of coordination and cooperation between human rights groups, aid agencies and donors; balanced use of conditionality, based on the drawing, by donors, of a clear distinction between emergency and development-oriented assistance; and a sustained effort to highlight the responsibilities of local authorities, foreign governments and businesses in meeting humanitarian and development objectives.
机译:本文研究了人道主义和人权组织为解决资源丰富和受冲突影响国家的治理问题而提出的倡议,重点是安哥拉的情况。人道主义原则排除了不加区分的条件性的使用,并指出了谨慎的倡导方法,旨在协助弱势群体。此外,向资源丰富的地方当局提供的援助相对微不足道,这意味着各个机构几乎没有什么杠杆作用,尤其是在商业利益而非人道主义或“善治”原则影响双边捐助者的优先事项时。资源丰富的背景要求:人权团体,援助机构和捐助者之间的高度协调与合作;根据捐助者的意见,在紧急援助和面向发展的援助之间明确区分有条件地加以利用;并持续努力强调地方当局,外国政府和企业在实现人道主义和发展目标方面的责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号