...
首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the esophagus: official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus >The acoustic cough monitoring and manometric profile of cough and throat clearing
【24h】

The acoustic cough monitoring and manometric profile of cough and throat clearing

机译:咳嗽的声学监测和测压廓线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cough and throat clearing might be difficult to differentiate when trying to detect them acoustically or manometrically. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of acoustic monitoring for detecting cough and throat clearing, and to also determine whether these two symptoms present with different manometric profiles on esophageal pressure topography. Ten asymptomatic volunteers (seven females, mean age 31.1) were trained to simulate cough and throat clearing in a randomized order every 6 minutes during simultaneous acoustic monitoring and high-resolution manometry. The accuracy of automated acoustic analysis and two blinded reviewers were compared. The pattern of the events and the duration of the pressure changes were assessed using the 30mmHg isobaric contour. There were 50 cough and 50 throat-clearing events according to the protocol. The sensitivity and specificity of automated acoustic analysis was 84% and 50% for cough, while the blinded analysis using sound revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 92%. The manometric profile of both cough and throat clearing was similar in terms of qualitative findings; however, cough was associated with a greater number of repetitive pressurizations and a more vigorous upper esophageal sphincter contraction compared with throat clearing. The acoustic analysis software has a moderate sensitivity and poor specificity to detect cough. The profile of cough and throat clearing in pressure topography revealed a similar qualitative pattern of pressurization with more vigorous pressure changes and a greater rate of repetitive pressurizations in cough.
机译:尝试通过声学或压力方式检测咳嗽和咽喉时,可能难以区分。这项研究的目的是评估声学监测在检测咳嗽和咽喉通畅方面的准确性,并确定这两种症状是否在食管压力地形图上呈现出不同的压力分布。训练了10名无症状志愿者(七名女性,平均年龄31.1),在同时进行声音监测和高分辨率测压的过程中,每6分钟随机模拟一次咳嗽和咽喉清扫。比较了自动声学分析的准确性和两名盲人审稿人的准确性。使用30mmHg等压线轮廓评估事件的模式和压力变化的持续时间。根据协议,有50次咳嗽和50次清嗓。自动化声学分析对咳嗽的敏感性和特异性分别为84%和50%,而使用声音进行的盲法分析显示,敏感性和特异性分别为94%和92%。就定性发现而言,咳嗽和咽喉清扫的测压曲线相似。然而,与清嗓相比,咳嗽与更多的重复加压和更剧烈的食管括约肌收缩有关。声学分析软件灵敏度中等,检测咳嗽的特异性较差。压力地形图上的咳嗽和咽喉清洁曲线显示出类似的定性加压模式,其中压力变化更为剧烈,并且在咳嗽中反复加压的比率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号