...
首页> 外文期刊>The Electricity journal >Technology Development and Learning: Coal Gasification in China and the United States
【24h】

Technology Development and Learning: Coal Gasification in China and the United States

机译:技术开发与学习:中美煤气化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Over the last 40 years, coal has been one of the main building blocks of energy systems in the U.S. and China. While coal use for both chemicals and power production is projected to continue growing rapidly in China, low natural gas prices and regulatory uncertainty associated with the environmental impacts of coal use, including but not limited to CO_2 emissions, have caused unprecedented uncertainty regarding the future of coal in the U.S. (EIA, 2013a). Several analysts envision a moribund state, if not a slow but decided demise, of coal-based power generation in the U.S. (for example, see the discussions in Cusick and ClimateWire, 2013; Darmstadter, 2013). Yet others, including several power industry executives, have resisted jumping on the "move away from coal'' bandwagon for primarily two reasons (Energy & Commerce Committee, 2013; Gross, 2013). First, drawing from lessons learned in the past decades, the first argument is that there is value in having a diversified fuel mix: putting all bets in one basket (natural gas) might expose the U.S. energy system and the economy to unwelcomed disruptions if the natural gas resource does not develop as expected (Energy & Commerce Committee, 2013). Second, coal has proven to be a very dynamic commodity and may make a quick comeback to regain share in the power stack if natural gas prices do not sustain the low levels seen during much of 2009- 2012 (Kebede, 2013; Plumer, 2013). Viewed from these two perspectives, coal may still have a significant role to play in the power-generation mix of the U.S. Even in the event that coal use in the U.S. is dramatically reduced due to new regulations, coal use elsewhere, particularly in Asia, is projected to continue increasing (BP Energy Outlook 2030; Scott et al., 2012). Indeed, increasingly U.S. coal exports are supplying some of that growing international demand for coal- 2012 marked the highest level of coal exports from the U.S. since 1981 (Yang, 2013). Thus, under a wide range of scenarios, it appears likely that coal will continue to be a major source of energy in the world, and the U.S. will remain a key player in the global coal supply chain.
机译:在过去的40年中,煤炭一直是美国和中国能源系统的主要组成部分之一。尽管预计中国用于化工和电力生产的煤炭将继续快速增长,但天然气价格低廉以及与煤炭使用对环境的影响有关的监管不确定性,包括但不限于CO_2排放,已经导致了对煤炭未来的不确定性。美国的煤炭(EIA,2013a)。几位分析师认为,美国煤基发电的状态虽然不是很缓慢但已决定性的消亡,但它已经处于濒临灭绝的状态(例如,参见Cusick and ClimateWire,2013; Darmstadter,2013)中的讨论。还有其他人,包括几位电力行业的高管,由于两个原因而拒绝加入“远离煤炭”潮流(能源与商业委员会,2013; Gross,2013)。首先,借鉴过去几十年的经验教训,第一个论点是,拥有多样化的燃料组合是有价值的:将所有赌注放在一起(天然气)可能会使美国的能源系统和经济遭受不受欢迎的破坏,如果天然气资源没有按预期发展(能源与商务委员会,2013年)。第二,煤炭已被证明是一种非常有活力的商品,如果天然气价格不能维持2009-2012年大部分时间的低位,煤炭可能会迅速卷土重来,重新夺回电力市场的份额(Kebede, 2013; Plumer,2013)从这两个角度来看,即使在美国由于新法规大幅减少了煤炭使用量的情况下,煤炭仍可能在美国的发电结构中发挥重要作用。我们预计其他地方,特别是亚洲的e将继续增加(《 BP 3030年能源展望》; Scott等,2012)。确实,越来越多的美国煤炭出口满足了国际上日益增长的煤炭需求-2012年是美国自1981年以来煤炭出口的最高水平(Yang,2013)。因此,在各种情况下,煤炭似乎仍将继续成为世界主要能源,而美国仍将是全球煤炭供应链中的关键角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号