首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease >The effects of group 1 versus group 2 carbapenems on imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an ecological study.
【24h】

The effects of group 1 versus group 2 carbapenems on imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an ecological study.

机译:第1组和第2组碳青霉烯类药物对亚胺培南耐药的铜绿假单胞菌的影响:一项生态研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Use of the group 2 carbapenems, imipenem and meropenem, may lead to emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance. The group 1 carbapenem ertapenem has limited activity against P. aeruginosa and is not associated with imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (IMP-R PA) in vitro. This retrospective, group-level, longitudinal study collected patient, antibiotic use, and resistance data from 2001 to 2005 using a hospital database containing information on 9 medical wards. A longitudinal data time series analysis was done to evaluate the association between carbapenem use (defined daily doses, or DDDs) and IMP-R PA. A total of 139 185 patient admissions were included, with 541 150 antibiotics DDDs prescribed: 4637 DDDs of group 2 carbapenems and 2130 DDDs of ertapenem. A total of 779 IMP-R PA were isolated (5.6 cases/1000 admissions). Univariate analysis found a higher incidence of IMP-R PA with group 2 carbapenems (P < 0.001), aminoglycosides (P = 0.034), and penicillins (P = 0.05), but not with ertapenem. Multivariate analysis showed a yearly increase in incidence of IMP-R-PA (3.8%, P < 0.001). Group 2 carbapenem use was highly associated with IMP-R PA, with a 20% increase in incidence (P = 0.0014) for each 100 DDDs. Group 2 carbapenem use tended to be associated with an increased proportion of IMP-R PA (P = 0.0625) in multivariate analysis. Ertapenem was not associated with IMP-R PA. These data would support preferentially prescribing ertapenem rather than group 2 carbapenems where clinically appropriate.
机译:使用第2组碳青霉烯,亚胺培南和美罗培南可能会导致铜绿假单胞菌耐药性的出现。第1组碳青霉烯类ertapenem在体外对铜绿假单胞菌的活性有限,并且与耐亚胺培南的铜绿假单胞菌(IMP-R PA)不相关。这项回顾性,小组级,纵向研究使用医院数据库收集了2001年至2005年的患者,抗生素使用和耐药数据,该数据库包含9个病房的信息。进行了纵向数据时间序列分析,以评估碳青霉烯的使用(确定的每日剂量或DDD)与IMP-R PA之间的关联。总共包括139185名患者,其中规定了541150种抗生素DDD:第2组碳青霉烯4637 DDD和厄他培南2130 DDD。总共查出779个IMP-R PA(5.6例/ 1000例入院)。单因素分析发现,第2组碳青霉烯类(P <0.001),氨基糖苷类(P = 0.034)和青霉素(P = 0.05)的IMP-R PA发生率更高,而厄他培南则没有。多变量分析显示,IMP-R-PA的发生率逐年增加(3.8%,P <0.001)。第2组碳青霉烯的使用与IMP-R PA高度相关,每100个DDD发生率增加20%(P = 0.0014)。在多变量分析中,第2组碳青霉烯的使用往往与IMP-R PA的比例增加有关(P = 0.0625)。厄他培南与IMP-R PA无关。这些数据将支持在临床上优先处方厄他培南而不是第2组碳青霉烯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号