...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic cytopathology >Detection of tumor cells in body cavity fluids by flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis.
【24h】

Detection of tumor cells in body cavity fluids by flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis.

机译:通过流式细胞仪和免疫细胞化学分析检测体腔液中的肿瘤细胞。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Measurement of electronic volume versus DNA content of nuclei can be used to discriminate between normal and malignant cells. Epithelial membrane antigen immunocytochemistry (EMA-ICC), a helpful ancillary test in body cavity fluids, is not universally accurate for detecting malignancy in effusions. The current study was undertaken to determine if multiparametric flow cytometry (based on simultaneous analysis of light scatter, nuclear volume, DNA, and nuclear protein content) in combination with (EMA-ICC) could be used for the detection of malignant cells in peritoneal and pleural fluids. We studied 130 body cavity fluids (68 peritoneal and 62 pleural fluids) by conventional cytology and multiparametric laser flow cytometry. EMA-ICC was performed using EMA antibodies and L-SAB detection system (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA). EMA-ICC had significantly higher sensitivity than conventional cytology (79% versus 59%, P = 0.016) and ploidy (79% versus 38%, P = 0.001). Cytology had significantly higher specificity than ploidy (97% versus 82%, P = 0.012). The differences in specificity between EMA-ICC and ploidy (87% versus 82%, P= 0.607) or EMA-ICC and cytology (87% versus 97%, P = 0.109) were not statistically significant. However, assuming serial testing, sensitivity increased significantly for the combinations of cytology and EMA-ICC (79.4%, P = 0.016) and cytology and ploidy (73.5%, P = 0.004) as compared to cytology alone (58.8%). Also, the combination of cytology and ploidy had a higher sensitivity than ploidy alone (73% versus 38%, P < 0.0001). However, the sensitivity associated with the three tests used in serial (85.3%) was not significantly different from the sensitivities corresponding to the combination of cytology and EMA-ICC (79%) or cytology and ploidy (73%). Multiparametric flow cytometry utilizing high resolution DNA, nuclear volume, protein measurement, and ICC, in combination with cytomorphology, may be a valuable tool for rapid identification of malignant cells in body cavity fluids.
机译:电子体积对细胞核DNA含量的测量可用于区分正常细胞和恶性细胞。上皮膜抗原免疫细胞化学(EMA-ICC)是一种对体腔积液有用的辅助测试,不能普遍准确地检测出积液中的恶性肿瘤。当前的研究是为了确定多参数流式细胞术(基于对光散射,核体积,DNA和核蛋白含量的同时分析)与(EMA-ICC)的组合是否可用于检测腹膜和腹膜中的恶性细胞。胸水。我们通过常规细胞学和多参数激光流式细胞术研究了130种体腔液(68种腹膜液和62种胸膜液)。使用EMA抗体和L-SAB检测系统(DakoCytomation,Carpinteria,CA)进行EMA-ICC。 EMA-ICC的敏感性显着高于常规细胞学(79%对59%,P = 0.016)和倍性(79%对38%,P = 0.001)。细胞学具有比倍性更高的特异性(97%比82%,P = 0.012)。 EMA-ICC和倍性之间的特异性差异(87%对82%,P = 0.607)或EMA-ICC和细胞学之间的特异性差异(87%对97%,P = 0.109)没有统计学意义。但是,假设进行串行测试,则与单独的细胞学(58.8%)相比,细胞学和EMA-ICC(79.4%,P = 0.016)和细胞学和倍性(73.5%,P = 0.004)的组合的敏感性显着提高。而且,细胞学和倍性的组合比单独的倍性具有更高的敏感性(73%对38%,P <0.0001)。但是,与连续使用的三种测试相关的敏感性(85.3%)与细胞学和EMA-ICC组合(79%)或细胞学和倍性(73%)对应的敏感性没有显着差异。利用高分辨率DNA,核体积,蛋白质测量和ICC结合细胞形态学进行多参数流式细胞术,可能是快速鉴定体液中恶性细胞的有价值的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号