...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic cytopathology >Fine-needle aspiration cytology: its origin, development, and present status with special reference to a developing country, India.
【24h】

Fine-needle aspiration cytology: its origin, development, and present status with special reference to a developing country, India.

机译:细针穿刺细胞学:其起源,发展和现状,特别涉及发展中国家,印度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was performed on a large scale at Memorial Hospital, New York, during the 1930s, but during the ensuing years, it did not gain much encouragement in United States. The technique had a resurgence in Scandinavia during the 1950s and 1960s, where it flourished before spreading to other parts of the world. It had also a revival in the United States, which contributed enormously to this tool in each and every aspect. The status of FNA during 1966-2002 was assessed through review of MEDLINE search data on FNA and its correlation with World Bank website data on classification of countries. A total of 849 journals published 5,609 articles on FNA over a period of 37 years. Both the number of publishing journals and the number of published articles on FNA were low during the 1960s (3.5 +/- 0.58 and 4.0 +/- 0.82, respectively) and 1970s (20.3 +/- 14.72 and 25.0 +/- 20.54, respectively), but their number increased sharply from the 1980s onward (78.2 +/- 25.65 and 147.2 +/- 66.89, respectively, during the 1980s, 126.2 +/- 11.94 and 301.4 +/- 35.99, respectively, during the 1990s, and 113.3 +/- 36.46 and 287.3 +/- 85.93, respectively, during the 2000s). The difference between the decades of 1960s-2000s, with respect to the number of publishing journals and published articles, was highly significant (P < 0.0001). Only 90 (10.6%) of the journals were from the arena of pathology and its branches. The remaining journals belonged to various other disciplines of medicine; a small fraction were even from the veterinary sciences. Ten journals, including three in the field of cytopathology, published 2,448 (43.6%) of the total articles on FNA. During 1987-2002, 46 (29.7%) of the 155 developing nations published articles on FNA, whereas 28 (52.8%) of the developed (high-income economies) countries did so, the difference being highly significant (P = 0.0044). The total number of publications from high-income economies was 3,124 (195.3 per year), as opposed to 772 (48.3 per year) from the developing world. The number of articles published from the developing nations (16.8 +/- 52.21) was significantly lower as compared with that from the high-income economies (111.6 +/- 242.03) (P = 0.005). Except for infectious diseases, the high-income economies had a definite edge over the developing nations in the absolute number of publications from each and every site/organ. However, when the frequency of publications on various organs/sites was compared between the two groups, it was found that the number of articles from high-income economies was significantly higher with respect to breast diseases (P < 0.001) and pancreatic lesions (P = 0.0158), whereas the developing nations published more frequently on small round cell tumors (excluding exclusive reports on lymphoma) and infectious diseases (P < 0.001). In India, FNAC was first introduced during the early 1970s and spread to different parts through formal teaching under the postgraduate curriculum in pathology and by conducting workshops and continuing medical education program for pathologists, surgeons/physicians, and radiologists. FNAC is now practiced in all medical colleges, in big public sector hospitals, and even in private clinics and laboratories. The number of centers practicing FNAC increased sharply during 1980s, as evident from the response of 69 laboratories in various parts of India to a questionnaire. As of 1998, 55.9% of the laboratories performed >/=1,000 cases of FNA per year. In 46% of the centers, pathologists alone performed the FNAC, whereas in 51%, they performed it in collaboration with radiologists and surgeons. Disposable syringes and needles were used in all the centers, but syringe holders were used in only in 61% of centers. In 86% of laboratories, two or more routine stains were used, and one or more ancillary techniques on fine-needle aspirates were adopted in 72.5% centers. Of the 772 publications from the developing world during 1987-200
机译:1930年代在纽约纪念医院大规模进行了细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC),但是在随后的几年中,在美国并没有得到太多的鼓励。该技术在1950年代和1960年代在斯堪的纳维亚半岛卷土重来,在此风靡一时,然后传播到世界其他地区。它在美国也得到了复兴,这在每个方面都对该工具做出了巨大贡献。通过审查MEDLINE有关FNA的搜索数据及其与世界银行有关国家分类的网站数据的相关性,评估了1966-2002年FNA的状况。在过去的37年中,总共849种期刊发表了5609篇有关FNA的文章。在1960年代(分别为3.5 +/- 0.58和4.0 +/- 0.82)和1970年代(分别为20.3 +/- 14.72和25.0 +/- 20.54)期间,有关FNA的出版期刊和已发表文章的数量都很低),但从1980年代开始,其数量急剧增加(1980年代分别为78.2 +/- 25.65和147.2 +/- 66.89,1990年代分别为126.2 +/- 11.94和301.4 +/- 35.99和113.3在2000年代分别为+/- 36.46和287.3 +/- 85.93)。在1960-2000年代的几十年间,就出版期刊和已发表文章的数量而言,差异非常显着(P <0.0001)。只有90(10.6%)种期刊来自病理学及其分支领域。其余期刊属于医学的其他各个学科。一小部分甚至来自兽医学。十种期刊,包括细胞病理学领域的三本,发表了2448篇(43.6%)关于FNA的文章。在1987-2002年期间,155个发展中国家中有46个(29.7%)发表了有关FNA的文章,而发达国家(高收入经济体)中的28个(52.8%)这样做了,差异非常显着(P = 0.0044)。高收入经济体的出版物总数为3,124(每年195.3),而发展中国家的出版物为772(每年48.3)。与高收入经济体(111.6 +/- 242.03)相比,发展中国家发表的文章数量(16.8 +/- 52.21)明显减少(P = 0.005)。除传染病外,高收入经济体在每个站点/机构的出版物绝对数量上都比发展中国家有一定优势。但是,当比较两组在各个器官/部位的发表频率时,发现高收入经济体的文章数量在乳腺疾病(P <0.001)和胰腺病变(P = 0.0158),而发展中国家发表的关于小圆形细胞肿瘤(不包括淋巴瘤的独家报道)和传染病的报道更为频繁(P <0.001)。在印度,FNAC于1970年代初首次引入,并通过病理学研究生课程下的正式教学,以及为病理学家,外科医生/内科医生和放射科医生举办的讲习班和继续医学教育计划,传播到各个地方。 FNAC现在在所有医学院,大型公立医院甚至私人诊所和实验室中都得到了实践。 1980年代,从事FNAC的中心数量急剧增加,从印度各地的69个实验室对问卷的答复中可以明显看出。截至1998年,每年有55.9%的实验室进行过FNA≥1,000例。在46%的中心中,仅病理学家进行了FNAC,而在51%的情况下,他们与放射科医生和外科医生合作进行了FNAC。所有中心都使用了一次性注射器和针头,但只有61%的中心使用了注射器支架。在86%的实验室中,使用了两种或更多种常规染色剂,并且在72.5%的中心采用了一种或多种细针抽吸物的辅助技术。在1987-200年间来自发展中国家的772种出版物中

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号