...
首页> 外文期刊>Developmental neurorehabilitation >Microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation versus general stimulation programs for post-coma persons with multiple disabilities
【24h】

Microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation versus general stimulation programs for post-coma persons with multiple disabilities

机译:微开关辅助程序与偶发性昏迷后综合症患者的或有刺激性刺激相比于一般刺激性刺激方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Assessing the impact of microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation on response engagement (Study I) and post-session alertness (Study II) of post-coma participants with multiple disabilities. Method: Study I included three participants whose scores on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) were 11 or 13. Study II included three participants whose CRS-R scores were 19, 13, and 14. In both studies, the participants received sessions with contingent stimulation (i.e., sessions in which activation of a microswitch with an eyelid or hand response produced 15s of preferred stimulation) and sessions with general, non-contingent stimulation (i.e., stimulation lasted throughout the sessions). Results: Study I showed an increase in response engagement/frequencies only during the contingent stimulation sessions. Study II showed that the participants' level of vigilance after those sessions was higher than after non-contingent stimulation sessions. Conclusion: Microswitch-aided programs with contingent stimulation would be more beneficial than programs with generalon-contingent stimulation.
机译:目的:评估带有偶然刺激的微开关辅助程序对患有多种残疾的昏迷后参与者的反应参与(研究I)和会后警觉性(研究II)的影响。方法:研究I包括三名参与者,他们的昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)得分为11或13。研究II包括三名参与者,其CRS-R得分分别为19、13和14。接受具有或有刺激性的刺激(即,通过眼睑或手部响应激活微动开关产生15s的优选刺激的刺激)和具有一般性,非或有刺激性的刺激(即刺激持续整个疗程)的刺激。结果:研究I显示,仅在偶然刺激期间,反应参与/频率增加。研究II显示,参与者在这些会议之后的警惕水平高于非偶然刺激会议之后。结论:具有偶然刺激的微开关辅助程序比具有一般/非偶然刺激的程序更有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号