...
首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >Financial liberalization and the middle-income trap What can China learn from the cross-country experience?
【24h】

Financial liberalization and the middle-income trap What can China learn from the cross-country experience?

机译:金融自由化和中等收入陷阱中国从跨国经验中学到什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Should China accelerate financial liberalization in order to avoid the middle-income trap? And, if the answer is yes, which specific reform steps should the government undertake? In this study we attempt to shed light on these questions by examining experiences of 80 countries during the period 1980-2010. Empirical analyses reveal that the growth effect of financial repression is insignificant among low-income economies, significantly negative among middle-income economies and significantly positive among high-income economies. Furthermore, for the middle-income group, repressive policies on credit, bank entry, securities market and the capital account significantly inhibit economic growth. In the meantime, law and order promotes growth among all income groups, while democracy has no impact whatsoever. We also validate these findings through a range of robustness checks. These findings offer important policy implications for China. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:中国是否应加速金融自由化,以避免出现中等收入陷阱?而且,如果答案是肯定的,政府应该采取哪些具体的改革措施?在这项研究中,我们试图通过研究80个国家在1980-2010年期间的经验来阐明这些问题。实证分析表明,金融抑制的增长效应在低收入经济体中微不足道,在中等收入经济体中显着为负,而在高收入经济体中为显着正。此外,对于中等收入群体,信贷,银行进入,证券市场和资本账户的压制政策大大抑制了经济增长。同时,法律和秩序促进了所有收入群体的增长,而民主则没有任何影响。我们还通过一系列的稳健性检查来验证这些发现。这些发现为中国提供了重要的政策含义。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号