...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >An open, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety profile of inhaled human insulin (Exubera) with metformin as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on a sulfonylurea.
【24h】

An open, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety profile of inhaled human insulin (Exubera) with metformin as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on a sulfonylurea.

机译:一项开放,随机,平行分组的研究,比较吸入性人胰岛素(Exubera)与二甲双胍作为辅助治疗在磺脲类药物控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety profile of adding inhaled human insulin (INH; Exubera) or metformin to sulfonylurea monotherapy in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed an open-label, parallel, 24-week, multicenter trial. At week -1, patients uncontrolled on sulfonylurea monotherapy were divided into two HbA(1c) (A1C) arms: > or =8 to < or =9.5% (moderately high) and >9.5 to < or =12% (very high). Patients were randomized to adjunctive premeal INH (n = 225) or metformin (n = 202). The primary efficacy end point was change in A1C from baseline. RESULTS: In the A1C >9.5% arm, INH demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in A1C than metformin. Mean adjusted changes from baseline were -2.17 and -1.79%, respectively; between-treatment difference was -0.38% (95% CI -0.63 to -0.14, P = 0.002). In the A1C < or =9.5% arm, mean adjusted A1C changes were -1.94 and -1.87%, respectively (-0.07% [-0.33 to 0.19], P = 0.610), consistent with the noninferiority criterion. Hypoglycemia (events/subject-month) was greater in the INH (0.33) than in the metformin (0.15) group (risk ratio 2.16 [95% CI 1.67-2.78]), but there were no associated discontinuations. Other adverse events, except increased cough in the INH group, were similar. At week 24, changes in pulmonary function parameters were small and comparable between groups. Insulin antibody binding increased more with INH but did not have any associated clinical manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on a sulfonylurea (A1C >9.5%), the addition of premeal INH significantly improves glycemic control compared with adjunctive metformin and is well tolerated.
机译:目的:比较吸入性人胰岛素(INH; Exubera)或二甲双胍联合磺酰脲类单一疗法对2型糖尿病控制不良的患者的疗效和安全性。研究设计与方法:我们进行了一项开放标签,平行,24周,多中心试验。在第-1周,未接受磺脲类药物单一治疗的患者被分为两个HbA(1c)(A1C)组:>或= 8到<或= 9.5%(中等高)和> 9.5到<或= 12%(非常高) 。患者被随机分为辅助餐前INH(n = 225)或二甲双胍(n = 202)。主要功效终点是A1C与基线相比的变化。结果:在A1C> 9.5%组中,INH表现出的A1C降低幅度明显大于二甲双胍。与基线相比,平均调整后的变化分别为-2.17和-1.79%;治疗间差异为-0.38%(95%CI -0.63至-0.14,P = 0.002)。在A1C <或= 9.5%组中,平均调整后的A1C变化分别为-1.94和-1.87%(-0.07%[-0.33至0.19],P = 0.610),与非劣效性标准一致。 INH(0.33)组的低血糖(事件/受试者-月)高于二甲双胍(0.15)组(风险比2.16 [95%CI 1.67-2.78]),但没有相关的停药发生。除INH组咳嗽增加外,其他不良事件也相似。在第24周时,各组之间的肺功能参数变化很小且相当。胰岛素抗体的结合随着INH的增加而增加,但没有任何相关的临床表现。结论:在磺脲类药物控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中(A1C> 9.5%),与辅助二甲双胍相比,餐前INH可以显着改善血糖控制,并且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号