首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity pattern is different in isolated impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose: the risk factor in impaired glucose tolerance for atherosclerosis and diabetes study.
【24h】

Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity pattern is different in isolated impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose: the risk factor in impaired glucose tolerance for atherosclerosis and diabetes study.

机译:在孤立的葡萄糖耐量受损和空腹血糖受损中,胰岛素分泌和胰岛素敏感性模式是不同的:动脉粥样硬化和糖尿病研究中葡萄糖耐量受损的危险因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE-Isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) are two risk categories for type 2 diabetes. This study compared both categories with respect to the degree of insulin secretion abnormalities and insulin resistance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-This is a crossover comparison of a population at high risk for type 2 diabetes. The subjects were recruited from the Risk Factor in Impaired Glucose Tolerance for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes (RIAD) study. They underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, with measurement of specific insulin, C-peptide, proinsulin, and free fatty acids at baseline and every 30 min after load for 2 h. Factor analysis was performed to evaluate the importance of insulin resistance and secretion abnormalities in both categories. RESULTS-All categories of prediabetic hyperglycemia had a higher cardiovascular risk factor level when adjusted for sex, age, and BMI compared to control subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Subjects with isolated IFG were more insulin resistant than those with IGT. By contrast, subjects with isolated IGT exhibited a more severe deficit in early- and late-phase insulin secretion versus IFG subjects. As shown with factor analysis, in IFG the insulin resistance factor explained 28.4% of the variance, whereas in IGT the insulin secretion factor was dominant, explaining 31.1% of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS-Our cross-sectional data from the RIAD study demonstrate that isolated IFG and isolated IGT are different with respect to the degree of insulin resistance and anomalies in insulin secretion, and that subjects with IGT exhibit a deficit in the early and late phases of insulin secretion. This finding may be important for a differential approach in primary prevention of type 2 diabetes.
机译:目的隔离的空腹血糖受损(IFG)和葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)是2型糖尿病的两个风险类别。这项研究在胰岛素分泌异常程度和胰岛素抵抗方面比较了这两种类别。研究设计和方法-这是2型糖尿病高危人群的交叉比较。该受试者是从动脉粥样硬化和糖尿病葡萄糖耐量降低的危险因素中招募的。他们进行了75 g口服葡萄糖耐量测试,在基线时以及负荷后2小时每30分钟测量一次特定的胰岛素,C肽,胰岛素原和游离脂肪酸。进行因子分析以评估两个类别中胰岛素抵抗和分泌异常的重要性。结果-与正常糖耐量正常的对照组相比,经性别,年龄和BMI调整后,所有类别的糖尿病前高血糖患者的心血管危险因素水平都较高。患有孤立的IFG的受试者比患有IGT的受试者更具胰岛素抵抗性。相反,与IFG受试者相比,具有孤立IGT的受试者在早期和晚期胰岛素分泌方面表现出更严重的缺陷。如因子分析所示,在IFG中,胰岛素抵抗因子可解释28.4%的差异,而在IGT中,胰岛素分泌因子占主导地位,可解释总差异的31.1%。结论-我们从RIAD研究获得的横断面数据表明,分离的IFG和分离的IGT在胰岛素抵抗程度和胰岛素分泌异常方面是不同的,并且患有IGT的受试者在胰岛素的早期和晚期均表现出不足分泌。这一发现对于2型糖尿病的一级预防中的差异方法可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号