首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A prospective two-center randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A prospective two-center randomized controlled trial

机译:糖尿病性周围神经病变的脊髓刺激和疼痛缓解:一项前瞻性两中心随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus. Unfortunately, pharmacological treatment is often partially effective or accompanied by unacceptable side effects, and newtreatments are urgently needed. Small observational studies suggested that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may have positive effects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter randomized clinical trial in 36 PDPN patients with severe lower limb pain not responding to conventional therapy. Twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to SCS in combination with the best medical treatment (BMT) (SCS group) and 14 toBMT only (BMT group). The SCS systemwas implanted only if trial stimulation was successful. Treatment success was defined as ≥50% pain relief during daytime or nighttime or " (very) much improved" for pain and sleep on the patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale at 6 months. RESULTS: Trial stimulation was successful in 77% of the SCS patients. Treatment success was observed in 59% of the SCS and in 7% of the BMT patients ( P < 0.01). Pain relief during daytime and during nighttime was reported by 41 and 36% in the SCS group and 0 and 7% in the BMT group, respectively (P < 0.05). Pain and sleep were "(very) much improved" in 55 and 36% in the SCS group, whereas no changes were seen in the BMT group, respectively (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). One SCS patient died because of a subdural hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment success was shown in 59% of patients with PDPN who were treated with SCS over a 6-month period, although this treatment is not without risks.
机译:目的:糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)是糖尿病的常见并发症。不幸的是,药理治疗通常是部分有效的或伴有不可接受的副作用,因此迫切需要新的治疗方法。小型观察性研究表明,脊髓刺激(SCS)可能具有积极作用。研究设计和方法:我们对36例严重下肢疼痛无反应的PDPN患者进行了一项多中心随机临床试验。 22名患者被随机分配到SCS联合最佳治疗(BMT)(SCS组)和14名仅接受BMT(BMT组)。仅在成功进行刺激后才能植入SCS系统。治疗成功的定义为白天或夜间疼痛缓解≥50%,或根据患者6个月的总体变化印象(PGIC)评分,疼痛和睡眠“(非常)改善”。结果:77%的SCS患者成功进行了电刺激。在59%的SCS和7%的BMT患者中观察到治疗成功(P <0.01)。据报道,SCS组白天和夜间的疼痛缓解分别为41%和36%,BMT组分别为0和7%(P <0.05)。 SCS组中55%和36%的疼痛和睡眠“(非常)改善了”,而BMT组中的疼痛和睡眠分别未见变化(P <0.001和P <0.05)。一名SCS患者死于硬膜下血肿。结论:在6个月的时间内接受SCS治疗的PDPN患者中,有59%表现出治疗成功,尽管这种治疗并非没有风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号