...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Toward defining a cutoff score for elevated fear of hypoglycemia on the hypoglycemia fear survey worry subscale in patients with type 2 diabetes
【24h】

Toward defining a cutoff score for elevated fear of hypoglycemia on the hypoglycemia fear survey worry subscale in patients with type 2 diabetes

机译:在2型糖尿病患者的低血糖恐惧调查忧虑次级量表中定义高血糖恐惧的临界值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To determine a cutoff score for clinicallymeaningful fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) on the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey Worry subscale (HFS-W). Research Design And Methods Data on the HFS-W, history of hypoglycemia, emotional well-being (World Health Organization-5 well-being index), and distress about diabetes symptoms (Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised) were available from Dutch patients with type 2 diabeteswhowere treated with oral medication or insulin (n = 1,530). Four criteria were applied to define a threshold for clinically meaningful FoH: 1) modal score distribution (MD criterion), 2) scores 2 SDs above the mean (SD criterion), 3) concurrent validity with severe hypoglycemia and suboptimal well-being (CV criterion), and 4) an elevated score (?3) on more than one HFS-Witem(elevated item endorsement [EI criterion]). Associations between the outcomes of these approaches and a history of severe hypoglycemia and suboptimal well-being were studied. Results Of the 1,530 patients, 19% had a HFS-Wscore of 0 (MD criterion), and 5% reported elevated FoH (HFS-W ? mean 1 2 SD; SD criterion). Patients with severe hypoglycemia reported higher HFS-W scores than those without (25 6 20 vs. 15 6 17; P 0.001). Patients with suboptimal well-being reported higher HFS-W scores than those with satisfactory well-being (20 6 18 vs. 13 6 15; P 0.001, CV criterion). Elevated FoH (defined by the EI criterion) was seen in 26% of patients. The SD and EI criteria were the strongest associated with history of severe hypoglycemia. The EI criterion was the strongest associated with suboptimal well-being. Conclusions Although no definite cutoff score has been determined, the EI criterion may be most indicative of clinically relevant FoH in this exploratory study. Further testing of the clinical relevance of this criterion is needed.
机译:目的在低血糖恐惧调查忧虑量表(HFS-W)上确定具有临床意义的对低血糖恐惧症(FoH)的临界值。研究设计和方法可从荷兰的2型糖尿病患者那里获得有关HFS-W,低血糖史,情绪健康(世界卫生组织-5健康指数)和糖尿病症状困扰(糖尿病症状清单修订)的数据。 2口服药物或胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者(n = 1,530)。应用了四个标准来定义具有临床意义的FoH阈值:1)模态分数分布(MD准则),2)得分比平均值高2个SD(SD准则),3)严重低血糖和次佳幸福感(CV)的并发有效性4)在一个以上的HFS-Witem(项目认可[EI标准])上得分较高(?3)。研究了这些方法的结果与严重低血糖病史和次优状态之间的关联。结果在1,530名患者中,有19%的HFS-Wscore为0(MD标准),而5%的人报告了FoH升高(HFS-W≥1 2 SD; SD标准)。重度低血糖患者的HFS-W评分高于无糖(25 6 20 vs. 15 6 17; P 0.001)。幸福感欠佳的患者报告的HFS-W评分高于幸福感较高的患者(20 6 18 vs. 13 6 15; P 0.001,CV标准)。在26%的患者中发现FoH升高(由EI标准定义)。 SD和EI标准与严重低血糖病史最相关。 EI标准与次优的幸福感最相关。结论尽管尚未确定明确的分界评分,但在这项探索性研究中,EI标准可能最能说明临床相关的FoH。需要对该标准的临床相关性进行进一步测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号