首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Beyond metformin: Safety considerations in the decision-making process for selecting a second medication for type 2 diabetes management: Reflections from a diabetes care editors' expert forum
【24h】

Beyond metformin: Safety considerations in the decision-making process for selecting a second medication for type 2 diabetes management: Reflections from a diabetes care editors' expert forum

机译:超越二甲双胍:在选择用于2型糖尿病治疗的第二种药物的决策过程中的安全考虑:糖尿病护理编辑专家论坛的反映

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The trend toward personalized management of diabetes has focused attention on the differences among available pharmacological agents in terms of mechanisms of action, efficacy, and, most important, safety. Clinicians must select from these features to develop individualized therapy regimens. In June 2013, a nine-member Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum convened to review safety evidence for six major diabetes drug classes: insulin, sulfonylureas (SUs), thiazolidinediones (TZDs), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. This article, an outgrowth of the forum, summarizes well-delineated and theoretical safety concerns related to these drug classes, as well as the panelists' opinions regarding their best use in patients with type 2 diabetes. All of the options appear to have reasonably wide safety margins when used appropriately. Those about which we know the mostdmetformin, SUs, insulin, and perhaps now also TZDsdare efficacious in most patients and can be placed into a basic initial algorithm. However, these agents leave some clinical needs unmet. Selecting next steps is amore formidable process involving newer agents that are understood less well and forwhich there are unresolved questions regarding risk versus benefit in certain populations. Choosing a specific agent is not as important as implementing some form of early intervention and advancing rapidly to some form of combination therapy as needed. When all options are relatively safe given the benefits they confer, therapeutic decision making must rely on a personalized approach, taking into account patients' clinical circumstances, phenotype, pathophysiological defects, preferences, abilities, and costs.
机译:糖尿病个性化管理的趋势已将注意力集中在可用药物之间的作用机理,功效以及最重要的安全性方面。临床医生必须从这些功能中进行选择,以制定个性化的治疗方案。 2013年6月,由9位成员组成的糖尿病护理编辑专家论坛召集了六种主要糖尿病药物的安全性证据:胰岛素,磺酰脲类(SUs),噻唑烷二酮类(TZDs),胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂,二肽基肽酶- 4种抑制剂,和钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白2种抑制剂。本文是该论坛的产物,概述了与这些药物类别相关的明确描述的理论安全性问题,以及与会专家针对2型糖尿病患者最佳使用情况的观点。如果正确使用,所有选项都具有相当宽的安全裕度。我们知道最二甲双胍,SU,胰岛素,也许现在也知道TZDsd的那些对大多数患者有效,可以放到基本的初始算法中。但是,这些药物使一些临床需求未得到满足。选择下一步是一个更艰巨的过程,其中涉及较新的药物,人们对这些药物的了解较少,并且对于某些人群中的风险与收益还没有解决的问题。选择一种特定的药物并不像实施某种形式的早期干预措施并根据需要迅速推进某种形式的联合疗法那样重要。如果所有选择都可以带来好处,那么相对来说比较安全,则治疗决策必须依靠个性化的方法,并考虑患者的临床情况,表型,病理生理缺陷,偏好,能力和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号