首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin in patients with chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: Impact on pain, polysomnographic sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life
【24h】

Randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin in patients with chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: Impact on pain, polysomnographic sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life

机译:慢性糖尿病周围神经性疼痛患者的阿米替林,度洛西汀和普瑞巴林的随机,安慰剂对照比较:对疼痛,多导睡眠图睡眠,白天功能和生活质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE - Chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is difficult to treat, with treatment regimens often inadequate at controlling pain and limited by side effects and drug tolerance. Secondary parameters, such as quality of sleep and mood, may also be important for successful DPNP management. The objectives of this study were to compare the analgesic efficacy of pregabalin, amitriptyline, and duloxetine, and their effect on polysomnographic sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life in patients with DPNP. RESEARCH DESIGNANDMETHODS - This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel group investigation of type 1 and 2 diabetic subjects with DPNP. Each treatment group had a single-blind, 8-day, placebo run-in followed by 14 days of lower-dose and 14 days of higherdose medication. At the end of each dose titration period, subjective pain, sleep, and daytime functioning were assessed during a 2-day residential period. RESULTS - All medications reduced pain when compared with placebo, but no one treatment was superior to any other. For sleep, pregabalin improved sleep continuity (P < 0.001), whereas duloxetine increased wake and reduced total sleep time (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). Despite negative effects on sleep, duloxetine enhanced central nervous system arousal and performance on sensory motor tasks. There were no significant safety findings; however, there was a significantly higher number of adverse events in the pregabalin treatment group. CONCLUSIONS - There was no significant difference in analgesic efficacy between amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin. However, there were significant differences in the secondary parameters, which may be of relevance when deciding the optimal treatment for DPNP.
机译:目的-慢性糖尿病周围神经性疼痛(DPNP)难以治疗,治疗方案通常不足以控制疼痛,并且受副作用和药物耐受性的限制。诸如睡眠质量和情绪等次要参数对于成功进行DPNP管理也可能很重要。这项研究的目的是比较普瑞巴林,阿米替林和度洛西汀的镇痛效果,以及它们对DPNP患者的多导睡眠图睡眠,白天功能和生活质量的影响。研究设计和方法-这是对DPNP的1型和2型糖尿病受试者进行的双盲,随机,平行分组研究。每个治疗组均进行单盲,8天安慰剂磨合,然后进行14天小剂量和14天大剂量药物治疗。在每个剂量滴定期结束时,在2天的住院期内评估主观疼痛,睡眠和白天功能。结果-与安慰剂相比,所有药物均减轻了疼痛,但没有一种疗法优于其他任何疗法。对于睡眠,普瑞巴林可改善睡眠连续性(P <0.001),而度洛西汀可增加清醒并减少总睡眠时间(P <0.01和P <0.001)。尽管对睡眠有负面影响,度洛西汀仍能增强中枢神经系统的觉醒和对感觉运动任务的表现。没有明显的安全性发现;然而,普瑞巴林治疗组的不良事件数量明显增加。结论-阿米替林,度洛西汀和普瑞巴林的镇痛效果没有显着差异。但是,次要参数之间存在显着差异,这可能与决定DPNP的最佳治疗方案有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号