...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Relationship of baseline HbA1c and HbA1c reduction following insulin therapy in Type 2 diabetes.
【24h】

Relationship of baseline HbA1c and HbA1c reduction following insulin therapy in Type 2 diabetes.

机译:2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗后基线HbA1c和HbA1c减少的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We read with interest the article by DeFronzo et al.[1] describing the positive relationship between baseline HbA_(1c) levels and the magnitude of HbA_(1c) change across 10 categories of glucose-lowering drugs. Their findings support and extend earlier data [2], suggesting that the baseline glycaemic status of patients with Type 2 diabetes influences the HbA_(1c) reduction in controlled clinical trials following pharmacological intervention. The level of this relation may vary from R~2 = 0.18 in the study of Bloomgarden et al. [2] to R~2 = 0.31 in the study of DeFronzo et al. [1] and may be attributable to the different clinical trials included in the analyses. The suggestion of the authors is to consider this relationship while assessing the clinical efficacy of diabetes therapies derived from clinical trials, especially as the mean baseline HbA_(1c) levels of clinical trial participants has fallen significantly over the past decade. The analysis of DeFronzo et al. [1] goes a step further, as it also includes clinical trials with insulin, incretin mimetics and an amylinomimetic, while other analyses were limited to oral drugs only [2,3].
机译:我们感兴趣地阅读了DeFronzo等人的文章[1]。描述了基线HbA_(1c)水平与HbA_(1c)幅度在10种降糖药物中变化之间的正相关关系。他们的发现支持并扩展了早期数据[2],表明在药物干预后的受控临床试验中,2型糖尿病患者的基线血糖状况影响HbA_(1c)的降低。在Bloomgarden等人的研究中,这种关系的水平可能从R〜2 = 0.18变化。 [2]在DeFronzo等人的研究中,R〜2 = 0.31。 [1]并且可能归因于分析中包括的不同临床试验。作者的建议是,在评估源自临床试验的糖尿病疗法的临床疗效时,应考虑这种关系,尤其是在过去十年中,临床试验参与者的平均基线HbA_(1c)水平已显着下降。 DeFronzo等人的分析。 [1]更进一步,因为它还包括使用胰岛素,肠降血糖素模拟物和拟淀粉酶的临床试验,而其他分析仅限于口服药物[2,3]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号