...
首页> 外文期刊>Developing world bioethics >CHALLENGES FACED BY RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES IN ELSALVADOR: RESULTS FROM A FOCUS GROUP STUDY
【24h】

CHALLENGES FACED BY RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES IN ELSALVADOR: RESULTS FROM A FOCUS GROUP STUDY

机译:萨尔瓦多研究伦理委员会面临的挑战:焦点小组研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To identify perceived barriers to capacity building forlocal research ethics oversight in El Salvador, and to set an agendafor international collaborative capacity building. Methods: Focus groups were formed in El Salvador which included17 local clinical investigators and members of newly formedresearch ethics committees. Information about the proposedresearch was presented to participants during an internationalbioethics colloquium sponsored and organized by the St. Jude Chil-dren's Research Hospital in collaboration with the National EthicsCommittee of El Salvador and the University of El Salvador. Inter-views with the focus group participants were qualitatively analyzed. Results: Participants expressed the need to tailor the informedconsent process and documentation to the local culture; forexample, allowing family members to participate in decision-making,and employing shorter consent forms. Participants indicated thateconomic barriers often impede efforts in local capacity building.Participants valued international collaboration for mutual capacitybuilding in research ethics oversight. Conclusions: Research ethics committees in El Salvador possess abasic knowledge of locally relevant ethical principles, though theyneed more training to optimize the application of bioethical principlesand models to their particular contexts. Challenges increase the valueof collaborative exchanges with ethics committee members in theUnited States. Further research on facilitating communicationbetween host country and sponsor country ethics committees canmaximize local research ethics expertise, and thus raise the standardof protecting human participants involved in international research.
机译:目标:确定萨尔瓦多地方研究道德监督能力建设的障碍,并为国际合作能力建设制定议程。方法:在萨尔瓦多成立了焦点小组,其中包括17名当地临床研究人员和新成立的研究伦理委员会的成员。有关这项拟议研究的信息已在由圣裘德·奇尔登研究医院与萨尔瓦多国家伦理委员会和萨尔瓦多大学合作举办的国际生物伦理学座谈会上向参加者介绍。定性分析了与焦点小组参与者的访谈。结果:与会者表示需要根据当地文化调整知情同意的程序和文件;例如,允许家庭成员参与决策,并使用较短的同意书。与会者指出,经济障碍经常阻碍地方能力建设的努力。与会者重视在研究伦理监督方面为相互能力建设开展国际合作。结论:萨尔瓦多的研究伦理委员会对当地相关的伦理原则具有基本的了解,尽管需要进行更多的培训以优化生物伦理原则和模型在其特定环境中的应用。挑战增加了与美国伦理委员会成员进行合作交流的价值。进一步研究促进东道国和赞助国伦理委员会之间的交流可以最大程度地提高当地研究伦理的专业知识,从而提高保护参与国际研究的人类参与者的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号