...
首页> 外文期刊>Hormone and Metabolic Research >Chemotherapy in patients with progressive, undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience.
【24h】

Chemotherapy in patients with progressive, undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience.

机译:进行性,未分化神经内分泌肿瘤患者的化学疗法:单中心经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Treatment of patients with undifferentiated and histologically confirmed neuroendocrine tumors (NET) usually includes chemotherapeutic intervention. This retrospective study evaluated the outcome of 2 such chemotherapies. 18 patients (11 males; age 56.2 +/- 2.5) with proven progressive disease were enrolled (mean Ki-67 34 +/- 5%). Patients were treated from 2005 to 2007 with regimen A (carboplatin, etoposide, paclitaxel), and from 2007 to 2009 with regimen B (cisplatin, etoposide). This change was due to low tolerability of regimen A. The standard imaging procedure was computed tomography. 8 patients underwent treatment with regimen A (mean 3.3 +/- 0.7 courses). Due to severe side effects, 3 patients had their therapy prematurely discontinued. The treatment responses of 6 patients who received more than 1 course were: 0% complete response (CR), 17% partial response (PR), 50% stable disease (SD), and 33% progressive disease (PD). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (range 3.2-10.0). In contrast, 12 patients received regimen B (mean 3.8 +/- 0.4 courses), and none of them dropped out because of side effects. The overall responses were: 0% CR, 17% PR, 42% SD, and 42% PD. The median PFS was 6.3 months (range 2.8-26.4). The response rates of both regimes were not statistically different. Patients who were treated with regimen B demonstrated comparable PFS and less severe side effects than patients who received regimen A. However, patients need to be aware of the relatively short PFS time. In order to improve therapeutic outcome of patients with progressive undifferentiated NET, new therapeutic approaches and larger multi-center studies are needed.
机译:对未分化且经组织学证实的神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)的患者的治疗通常包括化学疗法干预。这项回顾性研究评估了2种此类化学疗法的结果。入选了18例经证实患有进行性疾病的患者(11例男性; 56.2 +/- 2.5岁)(平均Ki-67 34 +/- 5%)。自2005年至2007年,患者接受A方案(卡铂,依托泊苷,紫杉醇)治疗,而2007年至2009年接受B方案(顺铂,依托泊苷)治疗。这种变化是由于方案A的耐受性差。标准的成像程序是计算机断层扫描。 8例患者接受了方案A的治疗(平均3.3 +/- 0.7个疗程)。由于严重的副作用,有3例患者过早中断了治疗。 6例接受超过1个疗程的患者的治疗反应为:0%完全缓解(CR),17%部分缓解(PR),50%稳定疾病(SD)和33%进行性疾病(PD)。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为6.7个月(范围3.2-10.0)。相比之下,有12名患者接受了方案B(平均3.8 +/- 0.4个疗程),但没有一个因副作用而退出。总体反应为:0%CR,17%PR,42%SD和42%PD。 PFS中位数为6.3个月(范围2.8-26.4)。两种方案的反应率均无统计学差异。与接受方案A的患者相比,接受方案B的患者表现出可比的PFS,且副作用较轻。但是,患者需要注意相对较短的PFS时间。为了改善进行性未分化NET患者的治疗结果,需要新的治疗方法和更大的多中心研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号