首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong medical journal =: Xianggang yi xue za zhi >Elective unilateral total knee replacement using continuous femoral nerve blockade versus conventional patient-controlled analgesia: Perioperative patient management based on a multidisciplinary pathway
【24h】

Elective unilateral total knee replacement using continuous femoral nerve blockade versus conventional patient-controlled analgesia: Perioperative patient management based on a multidisciplinary pathway

机译:连续性股神经阻断与常规患者自控镇痛的单侧全膝关节置换术:基于多学科途径的围手术期患者管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of our new multidisciplinary pathway for total knee replacement patients and compare outcomes after continuous femoral nerve blockade versus conventional patientcontrolled analgesia for postoperative pain. Design: Randomised controlled trial in a routine clinical setting. Setting: Acute orthopaedic wards and operating theatres, Yan Chai Hospital, Hong Kong. Patients: Sixty patients underwent elective unilateral total knee replacement under spinal anaesthesia from May 2009 to September 2011 and were randomly assigned to continuous femoral nerve blockade or conventional patient-controlled analgesia (30 patients in each group). Main outcome measures: Quality of pain control was evaluated by pain scores at rest and during mobilisation, opioid consumption, frequency of sideeffects, and patient satisfaction score. Rehabilitation progress was assessed according to the day of first starting weight-bearing exercise, day of independent walking in the ward with aid, Timed Up and Go test, and time elapsing till discharge. Surgical outcome was assessed by the Knee Society score 6 months after discharge, re-admissions, and occurrence of complications. Results: Patients having continuous femoral nerve blockade tended to have less pain on movement and achieved earlier mobilisation than those having patient-controlled analgesia. The former group consumed less opioids, had fewer side-effects, and were more satisfied with their postoperative analgesia. Both groups showed an equally high degree of satisfaction with the new management pathway. Hospital stays, surgical outcomes, and frequency of complications were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: Continuous femoral nerve blockade proved to be a feasible and better alternative mode of postoperative analgesia than our conventional patientcontrolled analgesia. Our new multidisciplinary management pathway and multimodal analgesic regimen featuring the continuous femoral nerve blockade appeared beneficial to patients and effective in our clinical setting.
机译:目的:评估我们新的多学科途径对全膝关节置换患者的有效性,并比较连续股神经阻滞与常规患者自控镇痛后的术后疼痛效果。设计:在常规临床环境中的随机对照试验。地点:香港仁济医院急性骨科病房和手术室。患者:2009年5月至2011年9月,有60例患者在脊柱麻醉下接受了单侧全膝关节置换术,并随机分配至连续股神经阻滞或常规患者自控镇痛(每组30例)。主要结局指标:通过静息和动员时的疼痛评分,阿片类药物的摄入量,副作用发生的频率以及患者满意度评分来评估疼痛控制的质量。根据首次开始负重锻炼的日期,在病房协助下独立行走的日期,Timed Up and Go测试以及直至出院的时间流逝,评估康复的进度。出院,再次入院和并发症发生后6个月,由Knee Society评分评估手术结局。结果:与具有患者自控镇痛作用的患者相比,具有连续股神经阻滞作用的患者趋于减轻运动疼痛并实现更早的运动。前一组消耗的阿片类药物较少,副作用较少,并且对其术后镇痛更满意。两组都对新的管理途径表示出同样高的满意度。两组的住院时间,手术结局和并发症发生频率相似。结论:与我们常规的患者自控镇痛相比,连续股神经阻滞被证明是一种可行且更好的术后镇痛替代方式。我们的新的多学科管理途径和以连续性股神经阻滞为特色的多模式镇痛方案看来对患者有益并且在我们的临床环境中有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号