...
首页> 外文期刊>Trees. Structure and Function >Optimisation of spatial allocation patterns in lianas compared to trees used for support
【24h】

Optimisation of spatial allocation patterns in lianas compared to trees used for support

机译:与用于支持的树木相比,藤本植物空间分配模式的优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are only limited possibilities to study the competition between trees and lianas in the top canopy of tropical rain forests. Furthermore, the important question how the leaf traits are related to twig support is rarely studied, especially regarding growing space partitioning between the self-supporting and the climbing growth form. Our study used the hot-air balloon within the "Operation Canopee" in the Masoala National Park, Madagascar, to test the differences in spatial allocation patterns of leaves and twigs in lianas and tree parts used for support. The sampling design emphasised to obtain a common assembly of twigs and leaves from both, trees and lianas. The results from the top canopy were compared to the data from the understorey regarding biomass and nutrients in leaves and distal twigs. In the understorey the reduction in structural investment was much stronger in lianas than in trees. The results showed that lianas reduced carbon investment per volume, but increased leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf area ratio (LAR), the latter driven by a reduction in leaf mass per area (LMA). In the top canopy, lianas contributed about one third of the leaf area density of 3 m(2) m(-3). For distal twigs, no relationship was found between twig biomass per volume and leaf area density for trees, but lianas balanced both structural parameters closely. The climbers benefit from the external support provided by the trees and optimise the area of assimilation tissue at low per volume investment for mechanical stability. Several traits such as low LMA and high leaf nitrogen concentrations together with higher LAR and optimised spatial investment advantage the climbing growth form and enable a fast acquisition of growing space. The results emphasize the necessity to consider spatial and structural features of growing space acquisition when dealing with plant competition.
机译:研究热带雨林顶层的树木和藤本植物之间的竞争的可能性很小。此外,鲜少研究叶片性状与枝条支撑关系的重要问题,特别是关于自支撑和攀登生长形式之间的空间分配。我们的研究使用了马达加斯加Masoala国家公园“檐篷行动”内的热气球,以测试藤本植物和用于支撑的树木部分的树叶和树枝的空间分配模式的差异。抽样设计强调要从树木和藤本植物中获得相同的树枝和树叶组装。将顶盖的结果与下层的叶和末梢小枝中的生物量和养分数据进行比较。在底层,藤本植物的结构性投资的减少比树木中的减少得多。结果表明,藤本植物减少了每单位体积的碳投资,但增加了叶氮浓度和叶面积比(LAR),后者是由每单位面积的叶质量(LMA)减少驱动的。在顶部的树冠中,藤本植物贡献了3 m(2)m(-3)的叶面积密度的三分之一。对于末梢小树枝,每体积的小树枝生物量与树木的叶面积密度之间没有关系,但是藤本植物紧密平衡了两个结构参数。登山者受益于树木提供的外部支持,并以较低的每单位体积投资来优化同化组织的面积,以提高机械稳定性。低LMA和高叶氮浓度以及较高的LAR和优化的空间投资等几个特征有利于攀登生长形式并能够快速获取生长空间。结果强调在处理植物竞争时必须考虑不断增长的空间获取的空间和结构特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号