...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental traumatology: official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology >Influence of abutment tooth position and adhesive point dimension on the rigidity of a dental trauma wire-composite splint
【24h】

Influence of abutment tooth position and adhesive point dimension on the rigidity of a dental trauma wire-composite splint

机译:基牙位置和粘合点尺寸对牙科外伤复合材料夹板刚度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background/Aim: The influence of abutment tooth position and adhesive point dimension on rigidity of wire-composite splints, used in dental trauma, was evaluated in vitro. Materials and Methods: A commercial artificial resin model was used. The central incisors served as injured teeth with increased mobility (degrees of loosening II tooth 21 and III tooth 11), whereas teeth 12/22 or teeth 13/23 served as non-injured teeth with physiological mobility. Horizontal and vertical tooth mobility before and after splinting was assessed, using a universal testing machine. Teeth were splinted with a wire-composite splint (0.8 mm). Four groups were assigned with respective abutment tooth position and adhesive point dimension: group 1 (13-11-21-23, 2 9 2 mm(2)), group 2 (12-11-21-22, 2 9 2 mm(2)), group 3 (12-11-21-22, 3 9 3 mm(2)), group 4 (12-11-21-22, 4 9 4 mm(2)). Results: For each group, tooth mobility after splinting was significantly higher than the physiological tooth mobility (P < 0.05). For teeth 11 and 12, no significant differences between Group 1 and 2 (P > 0.05) were found in tooth mobility after splinting. Significant differences were found in horizontal tooth mobility after splinting of tooth 11 between Group 2 and 3, Group 2 and 4 and Group 3 and 4, respectively (P < 0.05), whereas significant difference was found in vertical dimension for tooth 11 only between Group 2 and 4 (P < 0.05). Significant differences were found in horizontal mobility of tooth 21 between Group 2 and 3, and Group 2 and 4 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Splinting the injured teeth 11 and 21 and the bilateral uninjured abutment teeth (teeth 12/22 or teeth 13/23) with the stainless steel wire-composite splint (0.8 mm), can be considered flexible splinting. While mobility was still higher than in unaffected teeth, increase in size of the adhesive splinting point decreased horizontal but not vertical mobility in most cases.
机译:背景/目的:在体外评估了基牙位置和粘合点尺寸对用于牙科创伤的金属丝复合夹板刚性的影响。材料和方法:使用商业人造树脂模型。中切牙用作活动度增加(II牙齿21和III牙齿11的松动程度)的受伤牙齿,而12/22或13/23牙齿作为生理活动性的非受伤牙齿。使用万能试验机评估夹板前后的水平和垂直牙齿移动性。用钢丝复合夹板(0.8毫米)夹住牙齿。分配了四组各自的基牙位置和粘合点尺寸:第一组(13-11-21-23,2 9 2 mm(2)),第二组(12-11-21-22,2 9 2 mm( 2)),组3(12-11-21-22,3 9 3 mm(2)),组4(12-11-21-22,4 9 4 mm(2))。结果:对于每个组,夹板后的牙齿活动性均显着高于生理性牙齿活动性(P <0.05)。对于11号和12号牙齿,夹板后的牙齿活动性在1组和2组之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。第2组和第3组,第2组和第4组以及第3组和第4组之间,分别在第11组牙齿分离后水平牙齿活动性有显着差异(P <0.05),而第11组之间仅在第11组牙齿的垂直尺寸上存在显着差异2和4(P <0.05)。在第2组和第3组以及第2组和第4组之间,牙齿21的水平活动性存在显着差异(P <0.05)。结论:用不锈钢丝复合夹板(0.8 mm)夹住受伤的牙齿11和21以及双侧未受伤的基牙(牙齿12/22或牙齿13/23),可以认为是柔性夹板。虽然活动性仍然比未受影响的牙齿高,但在大多数情况下,黏合夹板点尺寸的增加会降低水平活动性,但不会降低垂直活动性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号