...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental traumatology: official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology >A systematic review of outcome measures used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following traumatic dental injuries
【24h】

A systematic review of outcome measures used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following traumatic dental injuries

机译:对牙外伤后治疗干预的临床试验中使用的结果指标的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are common, and appropriate treatment will maximize the chances of maintaining teeth in function while safeguarding their longevity and aesthetics. Subjectively, it appears that outcome measures used in studies investigating TDI are numerous and diverse. Objectives: To undertake a systematic review of the outcomes used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following TDI. Data sources: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and EMBASE databases were searched up to June 2014. Reference lists of eligible studies were cross-checked to identify additional studies and strategies to identify grey literature and ongoing trials were employed. Study selection: Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction. The study designs included were as follows: systematic reviews with/without meta-analyses, randomized and pseudo-randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. There were no language restrictions. Results: Ten studies confined to two types of TDI were included: avulsion (5) and non-vital immature permanent incisor teeth (5). The outcomes reported predominantly concentrated on injury activity and the physical consequence of injury. There was little consistency between studies for the length of follow up, the time points at which outcomes were evaluated or the methods used to measure them. Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity in outcomes reported for TDI in the literature. These findings preclude meaningful meta-analysis between studies. Future clinical studies need to consider collecting a more consistent and wider range of outcomes, which should include one or more from each of the following domains: health resources utilisation, adverse effects and quality of life and family outcome. There is a clear need for the development of a Core Outcome Set for TDI using robust and established methodology, thus optimizing the value of future research.
机译:背景:创伤性牙齿损伤(TDI)很常见,适当的治疗将最大程度地保持牙齿的功能,同时又能保证牙齿的寿命和美观。从主观上讲,似乎在用于研究TDI的研究中使用的结果指标多种多样。目的:对TDI后治疗干预的临床试验中使用的结果进行系统评价。数据来源:截至2014年6月,检索MEDLINE,Cochrane对照试验中心登记册,Cochrane系统评价数据库和EMBASE数据库。对符合条件的研究的参考清单进行交叉检查,以识别其他研究和策略,以识别灰色文献和正在进行的试验被雇用。研究选择:两位作者独立评估了纳入研究并进行了数据提取。包括的研究设计如下:有/无荟萃分析的系统评价,随机和伪随机对照试验和对照临床试验。没有语言限制。结果:仅限于两种TDI的十项研究包括:撕脱(5)和非重要的未成熟恒切牙(5)。报告的结果主要集中在伤害活动和伤害的物理后果上。在随访时间,评估结局的时间点或用于衡量结果的方法之间,研究之间几乎没有一致性。结论:文献报道的TDI结局存在明显的异质性。这些发现排除了研究之间有意义的荟萃分析。未来的临床研究需要考虑收集更一致,更广泛的结果,其中应包括以下各个领域中的一项或多项:卫生资源利用,不良影响以及生活质量和家庭结果。显然需要使用可靠且成熟的方法开发TDI的核心成果集,从而优化未来研究的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号