首页> 外文期刊>CIM Bulletin >Evaluating medical student searches of MEDLINE for evidence-based information: process and application of results.
【24h】

Evaluating medical student searches of MEDLINE for evidence-based information: process and application of results.

机译:评估医学系学生对MEDLINE的循证信息搜索:结果的处理和应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adequacy of the MEDLINE instruction routinely given to all entering medical students at the University of Miami School of Medicine and the ability of students to search effectively for and retrieve evidence-based information for clinical decision making by the end of their third-year. METHODOLOGY: The authors developed and implemented a strategy for evaluating the search strategies and articles selected by third-year students, who participated in the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in June 1996, 1997, and 1998, and reviewed the literature on evidence-based medicine and evaluation of medical student searches. RESULTS: A mean of 5% of the students' search strategies and a mean of 26% of articles selected were ranked "excellent" or "good"; a mean of 26% of search strategies were ranked "fair" and a mean of 69% were ranked "poor"; and a mean of 22% of articles selected were ranked "fair" and a mean of 52% were ranked "poor" based on the strategy developed to evaluate student searches. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating medical student searches for evidence-based information is an effective way of evaluating students' searching proficiency, and, in turn, the adequacy of the instruction they receive. Based on the results of the OSCE test, the school of medicine expanded the library's educational role and the library implemented major changes in the training program. Information on evidence-based medicine is now incorporated into the MEDLINE instruction. Library faculty evaluate the required searches performed by students for evidence-based information during their first and second years; 30% of students are identified for follow-up, individualized instruction based on the evaluation; and a new case-based curriculum has been proposed with a fourteen-week problem-based learning (PBL) block. These developments are timely in light of the evidence-based competencies recently published by the Association of American Medical Colleges.
机译:目的:评估在迈阿密大学医学院向所有入学的医学生常规给予的MEDLINE指导的适当性,以及学生在第三次学习结束前有效搜索和检索循证信息以进行临床决策的能力-年。方法:作者制定并实施了一项策略,用于评估1996年,1997年和1998年6月参加客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的三年级学生选择的搜索策略和文章,并回顾了有关证据的文献-基础医学和医学生搜索结果的评估。结果:平均5%的学生搜索策略和平均26%的所选文章被评为“优秀”或“良好”;平均有26%的搜寻策略被评为「一般」,平均有69%的搜寻策略被评为「较差」;根据评估学生搜索的策略,选择的文章中平均22%被评为“一般”,平均52%被评为“差”。结论:评估医学生对循证信息的搜索是评估学生搜索能力的有效方法,进而可以评估他们所接受的指导的充分性。根据OSCE测试的结果,医学院扩大了图书馆的教育作用,并在培训计划中进行了重大更改。有关循证医学的信息现已纳入MEDLINE指令。图书馆教师评估学生在第一年和第二年进行的必要搜索,以获取基于证据的信息;根据评估结果,确定有30%的学生需要进行跟进,个性化的指导;并提出了一个新的基于案例的课程,其中包含一个为期十四周的基于问题的学习(PBL)模块。鉴于美国医学院协会最近发布的基于证据的能力,这些发展是及时的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号