...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Vaccination with a gE-negative bovine herpesvirus type 1 vaccine confers insufficient protection to a bovine herpesvirus type 5 challenge
【24h】

Vaccination with a gE-negative bovine herpesvirus type 1 vaccine confers insufficient protection to a bovine herpesvirus type 5 challenge

机译:用gE阴性牛疱疹病毒1型疫苗接种后,对牛疱疹病毒5型挑战的保护作用不足

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present study, cross-protection to bovine herpesvirus type 5 (BHV-5) induced by bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1) vaccination was examined following inoculation of rabbits and calves with a glycoprotein E (gE)-negative BHV-1 vaccine and subsequent challenge with BHV-5. Rabbits (n=5) and calves (n=8) were vaccinated [five rabbits intranasally (IN), four calves IN and four intramuscularly (IM)] with 7.1 log(10)median tissue culture infective dose (TCID(50)) of the BHV-1 vaccine. Rabbits and calves were challenged IN [rabbits 2 weeks post-vaccination (pv); calves 5 weeks pv] with 9.1log(10)TCID(50) of BHV-5. Two out of five vaccinated rabbits died after challenge with typical BHV-5 disease, as did 3/5 non-vaccinated controls. In calves, 4/8 vaccinated animals displayed mild signs of disease, whereas 6/6 non-vaccinated controls developed signs of disease, so severe that 2/6 had to be killed. Besides, nasal virus shedding post-challenge was not reduced by vaccination. At necropsy, on day 21 post-challenge, typical BHV-5 lesions were evident in brain tissues of both vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves. Dexametasone administration at 180 days post-infection did not reactivate clinical signs despite BHV-5 shedding in nasal secretions of both vaccinated and non-vaccinated calves. These results show that the BHV-1 vaccine evaluated here did not confer protection to BHV-5 in rabbits. In calves, BHV-1 vaccination did confer some protection to BHV-5 induced clinical disease, but it did not prevent infection and had no effect on nasal virus shedding or on the development of encephalitic lesions.
机译:在本研究中,在给兔子和犊牛接种糖蛋白E(gE)阴性的BHV-1后,检查了由1型牛疱疹病毒(BHV-1)疫苗诱导的对5型牛疱疹病毒(BHV-5)的交叉保护。疫苗和随后的BHV-5攻击。给兔子(n = 5)和小牛(n = 8)接种[五只鼻内(IN),四只小牛IN和四只肌肉内(IM)],并以7.1 log(10)的中位数组织培养感染剂量(TCID(50))接种。 BHV-1疫苗。兔子和犊牛在接种后2周接受兔的攻击[pv];小牛5周pv],并伴以9.1log(10)TCID(50)的BHV-5。五分之二的疫苗接种兔子在受到典型BHV-5疾病攻击后死亡,而3/5非疫苗接种的对照组也是如此。在犊牛中,接种过4/8疫苗的动物显示出轻度的疾病迹象,而未接种疫苗的6/6对照则出现了疾病迹象,严重到必须杀死2/6。此外,接种疫苗并不能减少攻击后鼻部病毒的脱落。尸检时,在攻击后第21天,在接种小牛和未接种小牛的脑组织中均出现典型的BHV-5损伤。尽管BHV-5脱落的牛和小牛的鼻分泌物在感染后180天给予地塞米松并没有重新激活临床体征。这些结果表明,本文评估的BHV-1疫苗并未赋予兔BHV-5保护。在小牛中,BHV-1疫苗接种确实为BHV-5诱导的临床疾病提供了一定的保护,但它不能预防感染,对鼻病毒的脱落或脑病的发展没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号