...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Neutralizing antibody but not hemagglutination antibody provides accurate evaluation for protective immune response to H5N1 avian influenza virus in vaccinated rabbits.
【24h】

Neutralizing antibody but not hemagglutination antibody provides accurate evaluation for protective immune response to H5N1 avian influenza virus in vaccinated rabbits.

机译:中和抗体而非血凝抗体可为接种兔中对H5N1禽流感病毒的保护性免疫应答提供准确的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In order to develop an animal model and an assay method to evaluate protective immune response to H5N1 avian influenza vaccination, H5N1 avian influenza vaccine was prepared. New Zealand rabbits were assigned to receive two doses of vaccine with different hemagglutinin (HA) dosage. The sera from vaccinated rabbits was evaluated to determine antibody titer and specificity using different tested methods including hemagglutination inhibition assay (HI), neutralizing assay (NT), cross-HI assay, cross-single immunodiffusion assay and cross-neutralization assay. The titer of HI antibody from rabbits immunized with different doses of HA were no less than 1:40 among groups 14 days after the first immunization. Whereas the NT antibody titer was less than 1:10 among groups 14 days after the first immunization. NT antibodies can be detected 14 days after the second immunization in rabbits immunized at HA doses higher than 6 micro g, and the NT antibody titers were equal to or higher than 1:40. A good concentration-dependent NT antibody response can be detected in the vaccinated rabbits 14 days after the second immunization, and in contrast, no concentration-dependent relationship can be seen for HA antibody. The cross-HI test showed sera from vaccinated rabbits could cross react with influenza A H5N1 virus with the titers higher than 1:40. No cross reaction among different types (influenza A/H1N1 virus, influenza A/H3N2 virus, influenza B virus and influenza A/H5N1 virus) can be detected in the sera using the single immunodiffusion assay and using NT antibody test. This showed NT antibody test was demonstrated as a more accurate assay method for evaluating vaccination and quality of the vaccine than HI antibody test.
机译:为了建立动物模型和测定方法以评估对H5N1禽流感疫苗的保护性免疫应答,制备了H5N1禽流感疫苗。新西兰兔被分配接受两剂不同血凝素(HA)剂量的疫苗。使用不同的测试方法(包括血凝抑制测定(HI),中和测定(NT),交叉HI测定,交叉单次免疫扩散测定和交叉中和测定)对来自接种兔的血清进行评估,以确定抗体滴度和特异性。初次免疫14天后,各组间用不同剂量的HA免疫的HI抗体滴度不低于1:40。第一次免疫后14天,各组间NT抗体效价小于1:10。在以高于6 micro g的HA剂量进行免疫的兔子中,第二次免疫后14天可以检测到NT抗体,并且NT抗体效价等于或高于1:40。在第二次免疫后14天,接种疫苗的兔子中可以检测到良好的浓度依赖性NT抗体反应,相反,HA抗体没有浓度依赖性关系。交叉HI试验显示,接种疫苗的兔血清可以与滴度高于1:40的甲型H5N1流感病毒发生交叉反应。使用单免疫扩散测定法和NT抗体检测方法无法在血清中检测到不同类型(甲型/ H1N1流感病毒,甲型/ H3N2流感病毒,乙型流感和甲型/ H5N1流感病毒)之间的交叉反应。这表明NT抗体测试被证明是比HI抗体测试更准确的测定疫苗接种和质量的测定方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号