首页> 外文期刊>Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society >The Lower Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton & Charig, 1962: cranial anatomy, functional morphology, taxonomy, and relationships
【24h】

The Lower Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton & Charig, 1962: cranial anatomy, functional morphology, taxonomy, and relationships

机译:下侏罗纪鸟类恐龙Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton&Charig,1962年:颅骨解剖学,功能形态,分类学和关系

获取原文
           

摘要

The cranial anatomy of the Lower Jurassic ornithischian dinosaur Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton & Charig, 1962 is described in detail for the first time on the basis of two principal specimens: the holotype (SAM-PK-K337) and referred skull (SAM-PK-K1332). In addition several other specimens that have a bearing on the interpretation of the anatomy and biology of Heterodontosaurus are described. The skull and lower jaw of Heterodontosaurus are compact and robust but perhaps most notable for the heterodont dentition that merited the generic name. Details of the cranial anatomy are revealed and show that the skull is unexpectedly specialized in such an early representative of the Ornithischia, including: the closely packed, hypsodont crowns and 'warping' of the occlusal surfaces (created by progressive variation in the angulation of wear on successive crowns) seen in the cheek dentition; the unusual sutural relationships between the bones along the dorsal edge of the lower jaw; the very narrow, deeply vaulted palate and associated structures on the side wall of the braincase; and the indications of cranial pneumatism (more commonly seen in basal archosaurs and saurischian dinosaurs). Evidence for tooth replacement (which has long been recognized, despite frequent statements to the contrary) is suggestive of an episodic, rather than continuous, style of tooth replacement that is, yet again, unusual in diapsids generally and particularly so amongst ornithischian dinosaurs. Cranial musculature has been reconstructed and seems to conform to that typically seen in diapsids, with the exception of the encroachment of M. adductor mandibulae externus superficialis across the lateral surface of the temporal region and external surface of the lower jaw. Indications, taken from the unusual shape of the occlusal surfaces of the cheek dentition and jaw musculature, are suggestive of a novel form of jaw action in this dinosaur. The taxonomy of currently known late Karoo-aged heterodontosaurids from southern Africa is reviewed. Although complicated by the inadequate nature of much of the known material, it is concluded that two taxa may be readily recognized: H. tucki and Abrictosaurus consors. At least one additional taxon is recognized within the taxa presently named Lanasaurus and Lycorhinus; however, both remain taxonomically problematic and their status needs to be further tested and may only be resolved by future discoveries. The only other named taxon, Geranosaurus atavus, represents an invalid name. The recognition of at least four distinct taxa indicates that the heterodontosaurids were speciose within the late Karoo ecosystem. The systematics of Heterodontosaurus and its congeners has been analysed, using a restricted sample of taxa. A basal (nongenasaurian) position within Ornithischia is re-affirmed. There are at least four competing hypotheses concerning the phylogenetic placement of the Heterodontosauridae, so the evidence in support of the various hypotheses is reviewed in some detail. At present the best-supported hypothesis is the one which places Heterodontosauridae in a basal (non-genasaurian) position; however, the evidence is not fully conclusive and further information is still needed in respect of the anatomy of proximate outgroups, as well as more complete anatomical details for other heterodontosaurids.Heterodontosaurids were not such rare components of the late Karoo ecosystem as previously thought; evidence also suggests that from a phylogenetic perspective they occupied a potentially crucial position during the earliest phaes of ornithischian dinosaur evolution.
机译:根据两个主要标本,首次对下侏罗纪鸟类恐龙Heterodontosaurus tucki Crompton&Charig,1962的颅骨解剖进行了详细描述:整体型(SAM-PK-K337)和相关颅骨(SAM-PK-K1332 )。另外,还描述了其他一些与异齿龙的解剖学和生物学解释有关的标本。异齿龙的头骨和下颌紧凑而结实,但也许最值得称呼的是异齿牙列。颅骨解剖结构的详细信息被揭示,并显示出颅骨出乎意料地专门化于鸟嘴兽的这种早期代表中,包括:密密麻麻的,假牙弓和牙合面的“翘曲”(由磨损角度的逐渐变化产生)在连续牙冠上)下颌背侧骨骼之间异常的缝合关系;脑箱侧壁上非常狭窄,深深的拱形上颚和相关结构;以及颅骨气肿的征兆(在基部始祖龙和saurischian恐龙中更为常见)。牙齿置换的证据(尽管经常作相反的陈述,但人们早已认识到)表明牙齿置换是一种偶发性的而不是连续的方式,这再次在一般的小动物中尤其是在鸟眼恐龙中是不寻常的。颅骨的肌肉组织已经重建,并且似乎与通常在糖尿病患者中所见的肌肉组织相符,除了颞侧外侧表面和下颌外表面的内收肌外man肌的侵犯。指征取自脸颊齿列和颌骨肌肉组织的不寻常形状,暗示这种恐龙具有新颖的颌骨动作形式。审查了目前已知的南部非洲南部Karoo年龄的异齿龙的分类学。尽管由于许多已知材料的性质不足而使情况复杂化,但得出的结论是,可以容易地识别出两个分类单元:H。tucki和Abrictosaurus consors。至少一个额外的分类单元在当前命名为Lanasaurus和Lycorhinus的分类单元中被识别;但是,这两种分类仍然存在问题,它们的状态需要进一步测试,并且可能只能通过将来的发现来解决。其他唯一命名的分类单元Geranosaurus atavus表示无效的名称。至少四个不同的分类单元的识别表明,异齿龙科在Karoo晚期生态系统中是特异的。杂齿龙及其同类动物的系统分析已使用有限的分类单元样本进行了分析。再次确认了鸟嘴兽属中的一个基础(nongenasaurian)位置。关于异齿龙科的系统发育位置,至少有四个相互竞争的假设,因此,将详细审查支持各种假设的证据。目前,得到最好支持的假说是将杂齿龙科置于基础(非生殖龙)位置的假说。然而,齿龙科并不是最近的Karoo生态系统中罕见的组成部分;对于近邻群的解剖学以及其他异齿龙科的更完整的解剖学细节,仍需要进一步的信息。证据还表明,从系统发育的角度来看,它们在鸟眼恐龙进化的最早阶段占据着潜在的关键位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号