首页> 外文期刊>Human Reproduction >A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration.
【24h】

A randomized controlled study comparing pain experience between a newly designed needle with a thin tip and a standard needle for oocyte aspiration.

机译:一项随机对照研究,比较了新设计的细头针和标准卵子抽吸针的疼痛体验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND; Ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is often performed under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the overall pain experience of a newly designed reduced needle (RN) compared with a thicker standard needle (SN). METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multi-centre study was performed at four different clinics from June to December 2009. The oocyte aspiration was performed under local anaesthesia, either with a needle with a reduced diameter (0.9 mm) for the last 50 mm from the tip (RN) or with a SN (1.4 mm). A total of 257 patients were randomized (RN: n = 129; SN: n = 128). The primary endpoint was the overall pain experience self-assessed and registered by the patient on a visual analogue scale (VAS 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = unbearable pain) immediately after the oocyte retrieval. Secondary end-points such as vaginal bleeding and several embryological parameters were also registered. RESULTS: The overall pain during the oocyte retrieval procedure was significantly lower in the RN group than in the SN group (mean 21.0 mm, SD 17.5 mm and median 19.0 mm versus mean 26.0 mm, SD 19.9 mm and median 24.0 mm; P = 0.040, difference between groups mean-5.0 mm, 95% CI: 9.7 to-0.4). This was also true when adjusting for baseline characteristics such as number of follicles, number of previous oocyte pick-up, body mass index and age, by a multiple linear regression analysis. Significantly more patients (40 of 126) had less than expected vaginal bleeding in the RN group when compared with the SN group (24 of 124; 32 versus 19%; P = 0.03 and 95% CI 1.7-23.0%). No differences were found between the two needles with regard to additional i.v. analgesia, aspiration time, oocyte recovery, fertilization, cleavage rate, number of good quality embryos, number of embryos for freezing and pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Oocyte aspiration performed with the newly designed thinner-tipped needle resulted in significantly less overall pain and less vaginal bleeding, without prolonging the retrieval procedure or influence the oocyte recovery rate, when compared with a SN. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00924885.
机译:背景;超声引导下经阴道卵母细胞的取出通常在门诊的局部麻醉下进行。这项研究的目的是比较新设计的缩小针(RN)与较粗的标准针(SN)的总体疼痛体验。方法:从2009年6月至2009年12月,在四个不同的诊所进行了一项前瞻性,随机,多中心研究。在局部麻醉下进行卵母细胞抽吸术,或者使用直径减小(0.9毫米)的针头,从距离尖端(RN)或SN(1.4毫米)。共有257名患者被随机分组​​(RN:n = 129; SN:n = 128)。主要终点是在卵母细胞取出后立即以视觉模拟量表(VAS 0 mm =无疼痛至100 mm =难以忍受的疼痛)自我评估和记录患者的总体疼痛经历。还记录了次要终点,例如阴道出血和一些胚胎学参数。结果:RN组的卵母细胞取回过程中的总体疼痛明显低于SN组(平均21.0 mm,SD 17.5 mm和中值19.0 mm相对于平均26.0 mm,SD 19.9 mm和中值24.0 mm; P = 0.040 ,两组之间的差异平均值-5.0 mm,95%CI:9.7至-0.4)。当通过多元线性回归分析调整基线特征(例如卵泡数,以前的卵母细胞摄取数,体重指数和年龄)时,也是如此。与SN组相比,RN组有更多的患者(126名中的40名)阴道出血少于预期(124名中的24名; 32%vs 19%; P = 0.03和95%CI 1.7-23.0%)。关于另外的静脉内注射,两根针之间没有发现差异。镇痛,抽吸时间,卵母细胞恢复,受精,卵裂率,优质胚胎数,冷冻胚胎数和妊娠率。结论:与SN相比,使用新设计的较细尖的针头进行卵母细胞抽吸可显着减少总体疼痛并减少阴道流血,而不会延长检索过程或影响卵母细胞的恢复率。 Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00924885。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号