...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Reproduction >Fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors.
【24h】

Fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors.

机译:用于人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)研究的新鲜胚胎捐赠:被要求成为胚胎捐赠者的IVF对夫妇的经验和价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: This article reports on an investigation of the views of IVF couples asked to donate fresh embryos for research and contributes to the debates on: the acceptability of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research, the moral status of the human embryo and embryo donation for research. METHODS: A hypothesis-generating design was followed. All IVF couples in one UK clinic who were asked to donate embryos in 1 year were contacted 6 weeks after their pregnancy result. Forty four in-depth interviews were conducted. RESULTS: Interviewees were preoccupied with IVF treatment and the request to donate was a secondary consideration. They used a complex and dynamic system of embryo classification. Initially, all embryos were important but then their focus shifted to those that had most potential to produce a baby. At that point, 'other' embryos were less important though they later realise that they did not know what happened to them. Guessing that these embryos went to research, interviewees preferred not to contemplate what that might entail. The embryos that caused interviewees most concern were good quality embryos that might have produced a baby but went to research instead. 'The' embryo, the morally laden, but abstract, entity, did not play a central role in their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This study, despite missing those who refuse to donate embryos, suggests that debates on embryo donation for hESC research should include the views of embryo donors and should consider the social, as well as the moral, status of the human embryo.
机译:背景:本文报道了对IVF夫妇要求捐赠新鲜胚胎进行研究的观点的调查,并为以下方面的辩论做出了贡献:人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)研究的可接受性,人类胚胎的道德状况和胚胎捐赠用于研究。方法:遵循假设生成设计。在英国的一家诊所中,所有被要求在1年内捐赠胚胎的IVF夫妇在怀孕结果后6周都进行了接触。进行了四十四次深入采访。结果:受访者全神贯注于试管婴儿治疗,捐赠的要求是次要考虑因素。他们使用了复杂而动态的胚胎分类系统。最初,所有胚胎都很重要,但后来它们的重点转移到了最有可能产生婴儿的胚胎上。在那个时候,“其他”胚胎并不重要,尽管他们后来意识到他们不知道发生了什么。猜测这些胚胎已进入研究阶段,受访者不愿考虑可能需要做些什么。引起受访者最关注的胚胎是高质量的胚胎,这些胚胎可能会产生一个婴儿,但随后进行了研究。 “这个”胚胎是道德上举足轻重但抽象的实体,在其决策中并未发挥核心作用。结论:尽管缺少那些拒绝捐献胚胎的人,这项研究表明,有关人类胚胎干细胞研究的胚胎捐献的辩论应包括胚胎捐献者的观点,并应考虑人类胚胎的社会地位和道德地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号