...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods
【24h】

Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods

机译:每日和每月大规模气候数据的实用性:两种统计缩减方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Downscaling of climate model data is essential to local and regional impact analysis. We compare two methods of statistical downscaling to produce continuous, gridded time series of precipitation and surface air temperature at a 1/8-degree (approximately 140km(2) per grid cell) resolution over the western U.S. We use NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data from 1950-1999 as a surrogate General Circulation Model (GCM). The two methods included are constructed analogues (CA) and a bias correction and spatial downscaling (BCSD), both of which have been shown to be skillful in different settings, and BCSD has been used extensively in hydrologic impact analysis. Both methods use the coarse scale Reanalysis fields of precipitation and temperature as predictors of the corresponding fine scale fields. CA downscales daily large-scale data directly and BCSD downscales monthly data, with a random resampling technique to generate daily values. The methods produce generally comparable skill in producing downscaled, gridded fields of precipitation and temperatures at a monthly and seasonal level. For daily precipitation, both methods exhibit limited skill in reproducing both observed wet and dry extremes and the difference between the methods is not significant, reflecting the general low skill in daily precipitation variability in the re-analysis data. For low temperature extremes, the CA method produces greater downscaling skill than BCSD for fall and winter seasons. For high temperature extremes, CA demonstrates higher skill than BCSD in summer. We find that the choice of most appropriate downscaling technique depends on the variables, seasons, and regions of interest, on the availability of daily data, and whether the day to day correspondence of weather from the GCM needs to be reproduced for some applications. The ability to produce skillful downscaled daily data depends primarily on the ability of the climate model to show daily skill.
机译:气候模型数据的缩减对于本地和区域影响分析至关重要。我们比较了两种统计缩小方法,以在美国西部以1/8度(每个网格单元约140km(2))的分辨率生成连续的网格化降水和时间序列的时间序列,我们使用NCEP / NCAR Reanalysis数据1950-1999年作为替代的一般流通模型(GCM)。包括的两种方法是构造的类似物(CA)和偏差校正和空间缩减(BCSD),这两种方法均显示出在不同背景下的熟练技能,并且BCSD已广泛用于水文影响分析中。两种方法都使用降水和温度的粗尺度再分析场作为相应细尺度场的预测因子。 CA使用随机重采样技术生成每日值,从而直接缩减每日大型数据的规模,而BCSD缩减每月数据的规模。该方法在按月和按季节产生按比例缩小的网格化降水和温度场方面具有一般可比的技能。对于每日降水,这两种方法在再现观测到的湿极端和干极端时均显示出有限的技能,并且两种方法之间的差异并不显着,这反映了重新分析数据中日常降水变化的普遍较低技能。对于低温极端情况,在秋季和冬季,CA方法比BCSD产生更大的降尺度技巧。对于高温极端情况,CA在夏季表现出比BCSD高的技能。我们发现,最合适的降尺度技术的选择取决于变量,季节和感兴趣的区域,每日数据的可用性以及是否需要为某些应用程序复制来自GCM的天气的日常对应关系。生成精巧的按比例缩小的日常数据的能力主要取决于气候模型显示日常技能的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号