...
首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >An analysis of prospective risk factors for aortic stiffness in men: 20-year follow-up from the Caerphilly prospective study.
【24h】

An analysis of prospective risk factors for aortic stiffness in men: 20-year follow-up from the Caerphilly prospective study.

机译:男性主动脉僵硬的前瞻性危险因素分析:来自Caerphilly前瞻性研究的20年随访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Arterial stiffness is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk. The precise risk factors for arterial stiffening remain unclear. We aimed to identify potential risk factors using prospective exposure data from the Caerphilly Prospective Study. Aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index were measured in 825 men and related to current (2004) and baseline (1979-1988) anthropometric, hemodynamic, and biochemical factors. The mean age of the men was 74 years, with an average follow-up of 20 years. The only independent baseline predictors of current velocity were pulse pressure (standardized beta-coefficient: 0.58), C-reactive protein (0.35), glucose (0.25), and waist circumference (0.23). The sole baseline predictor of current augmentation index was fibrinogen (0.78). After additional adjustment for the corresponding current risk factor, pulse wave velocity was best related to cumulative exposure to C-reactive protein, whereas augmentation index was most strongly related to current levels. Velocity was also more strongly correlated with baseline levels of triglycerides and smoking but with current waist circumference. The pulse pressure heart rate product assessed over the whole of 20 years was independently correlated with aortic pulse wave velocity but not augmentation index. Other than blood pressure, established cardiovascular risk factors have only a modest effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflection. Inflammation and the level of repetitive cyclic stress are important predictors of aortic stiffness, whereas wave reflection is predicted by acute inflammation only. Adequate control of pulse pressure and heart rate, as well as reducing inflammation, may, in the long-term, retard aortic stiffening, although this remains to be tested directly.
机译:动脉僵硬度是心血管风险的重要决定因素。动脉硬化的确切危险因素仍不清楚。我们旨在使用来自卡菲利前瞻性研究的前瞻性暴露数据来识别潜在的风险因素。在825名男性中测量了主动脉脉搏波速度和增强指数,并与当前(2004年)和基线(1979-1988年)的人体测量学,血液动力学和生化因素相关。男性的平均年龄为74岁,平均随访时间为20岁。电流速度的唯一独立的基线预测因子是脉压(标准β系数:0.58),C反应蛋白(0.35),葡萄糖(0.25)和腰围(0.23)。当前增加指数的唯一基线预测因子是纤维蛋白原(0.78)。在对相应的当前危险因素进行进一步调整后,脉搏波速度与累积暴露于C反应蛋白最相关,而增强指数与电流水平最相关。速度也与甘油三酸酯和吸烟的基线水平更紧密相关,但与当前腰围相关。在整个20年中评估的脉压心率乘积与主动脉脉搏波速度独立相关,但与增强指数无关。除血压外,已确定的心血管危险因素仅对主动脉僵硬和波反射有中等程度的影响。炎症和反复循环应力水平是主动脉僵硬的重要预测指标,而波反射仅由急性炎症预测。从长远来看,对脉压和心率的适当控制以及减轻炎症可能会延迟主动脉硬化,尽管这有待直接测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号