...
首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Thresholds for Diagnosing Hypertension Based on Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Cardiovascular Risk
【24h】

Thresholds for Diagnosing Hypertension Based on Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Cardiovascular Risk

机译:基于自动办公室血压测量和心血管风险的高血压诊断阈值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The risk of cardiovascular events in relation to blood pressure is largely based on readings taken with a mercury sphygmomanometer in populations which differ from those of today in terms of hypertension severity and drug therapy. Given replacement of the mercury sphygmomanometer with electronic devices, we sought to determine the blood pressure threshold for a significant increase in cardiovascular risk using a fully automated device, which takes multiple readings with the subject resting quietly alone. Participants were 3627 community-dwelling residents aged >65 years untreated for hypertension. Automated office blood pressure readings were obtained in a community pharmacy with subjects seated and undisturbed. This method for recording blood pressure produces similar readings in different settings, including a pharmacy and family doctor's office providing the above procedures are followed. Subjects were followed for a mean (SD) of 4.9 (1.0) years for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were computed for 10 mm Hg increments in blood pressure (mm Hg) using Cox proportional hazards regression and the blood pressure category with the lowest event rate as the reference category. A total of 271 subjects experienced a cardiovascular event. There was a significant (P=0.02) increase in the hazard ratio of 1.66 (1.09, 2.54) at a systolic blood pressure of 135 to 144 and 1.72 (1.21, 2.45; P=0.003) at a diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89. A significant (P=0.03) increase in hazard ratio of 1.73 (1.04, 2.86) occurred with a pulse pressure of 80 to 89. These findings are consistent with a threshold of 135/85 for diagnosing hypertension in older subjects using automated office blood pressure.
机译:与血压相关的心血管事件的风险主要是基于汞血压计在人群中的读数,该读数在高血压严重程度和药物治疗方面与当今的人群有所不同。假设用电子设备代替水银血压计,我们试图使用全自动设备确定血压阈值,以显着增加心血管疾病的风险,该设备需要多次读数,而受试者只能安静地休息。参与者是3627名年龄在65岁以上且未经高血压治疗的社区居民。在社区药房中,坐着和不打扰的受试者获得自动的办公室血压读数。这种记录血压的方法在不同的环境下会产生相似的读数,包括遵循上述程序的药房和家庭医生办公室。受试者的致命和非致命心血管事件平均(SD)为4.9(1.0)年。使用Cox比例风险回归和事件发生率最低的血压类别作为参考类别,针对血压(mm Hg)的10 mm Hg增量计算调整后的危险比(95%置信区间)。共有271位受试者经历了心血管事件。收缩压在135至144时,危险比显着(P = 0.02)增加1.66(1.09,2.54);舒张压在80至89时,危险比显着增加1.72(1.21,2.45; P = 0.003) 。在80至89的脉压下,危险比显着增加(P = 0.03)1.73(1.04,2.86),这些发现与使用自动办公室血液诊断老年受试者的高血压阈值135/85一致。压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号