...
首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Contrasting effects of selective T- and L-type calcium channel blockade on glomerular damage in DOCA hypertensive rats.
【24h】

Contrasting effects of selective T- and L-type calcium channel blockade on glomerular damage in DOCA hypertensive rats.

机译:选择性T型和L型钙通道阻滞对DOCA高血压大鼠肾小球损害的对比作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mibefradil and amlodipine are calcium antagonists with different channel selectivities. Mibefradil blocks both L- and T-type calcium channels; although in the usual pharmacological doses, it predominantly blocks the T-type channels. In contrast, amlodipine selectively blocks L-type channels. The goal of the present study was to assess whether this differential selectivity would result in different effects on end-organ damage in experimental hypertension. For this purpose, deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive rats were treated either with equipotent doses of mibefradil or amlodipine (30 mg. kg(-1). d(-1) as food admix). Despite the fact that both drugs decreased systolic arterial pressure to the same extent (140+/-5 mm Hg in the mibefradil group and 144+/-3 mm Hg in the amlodipine group versus 225+/-5 mm Hg in the untreated-DOCA group), only mibefradil decreased proteinuria (35. 5+/-6.5 versus 103.3+/-14.1 mg/24 h in untreated DOCA-salt animals) and prevented glomerular lesions. Both drugs, however, prevented the occurrence of vascular renal lesions. To elucidate the mechanism responsible for this difference, we evaluated in an additional series of experiments the effects of mibefradil and amlodipine on plasma and renal renin concentrations, as well as the effects of the addition of enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, given on top of both drugs on proteinuria. Amlodipine, in contrast to mibefradil, markedly stimulated the plasma (17.8+/-2.6 ng Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1) in the amlodipine group versus 3.9+/-0.4 ng Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1) in the mibefradil group and 3.2+/-0.3 ng Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1) in the untreated-DOCA group) and renal (2.42+/-0.37 ng Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1) in the amlodipine group versus 0.36+/-0.04 ng Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1) in the mibefradil group and 0.26+/-0.08 ng Ang I. mL(-1). h(-1) in the untreated-DOCA group) renin concentrations. Stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system could explain the absence of a renal protective effect of amlodipine. This was also suggested by the fact that enalapril given in addition to amlodipine could decrease proteinuria. In conclusion, T-type channel blockade by mibefradil decreases blood pressure without stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system and therefore prevents most of the glomerular damage in DOCA hypertensive rats.
机译:米贝拉地尔和氨氯地平是具有不同通道选择性的钙拮抗剂。咪贝地尔阻断L型和T型钙通道。尽管以通常的药理学剂量,它主要阻断T型通道。相反,氨氯地平选择性地阻断L型通道。本研究的目的是评估这种差异选择性是否会导致实验性高血压对终末器官损害的不同影响。为了这个目的,用等剂量的米贝拉地尔或氨氯地平(30 mg。kg(-1)。d(-1)作为食物混合物)治疗醋酸脱氧肾上腺皮质激素(DOCA)-盐高血压大鼠。尽管两种药物均使收缩压降低了相同程度(米贝地尔组为140 +/- 5 mm Hg,氨氯地平组为144 +/- 3 mm Hg,未治疗组为225 +/- 5 mm Hg), DOCA组),仅米非拉地尔可减少蛋白尿(35. 5 +/- 6.5 vs. 103.3 +/- 14.1 mg / 24 h,未经治疗的DOCA盐动物),可预防肾小球病变。但是,这两种药物均能预防血管性肾损害的发生。为了阐明造成这种差异的机制,我们在其他一系列实验中评估了米贝拉地尔和氨氯地平对血浆和肾素的浓度的影响,以及在两者之上均添加了ACE抑制剂依那普利的影响。蛋白尿药物。与米贝拉地尔相反,氨氯地平显着刺激血浆(氨氯地平组的血浆刺激度为17.8 +/- 2.6 ng Ang I.mL(-1)。h(-1)与3.9 +/- 0.4 ng Ang I.mL(-1) )。米贝地尔组的h(-1)和未治疗的DOCA组的3.2 +/- 0.3 ng Ang I.mL(-1)。未经治疗的DOCA组的h(-1))和肾脏(2.42 +/- 0.37 ng Ang I氨氯地平组中的.mL(-1).h(-1)与米贝拉地尔组中的0.36 +/- 0.04 ng Ang I.mL(-1).h(-1)。米贝拉地尔组和0.26 +/- 0.08 ng Ang I未处理的DOCA组中的.mL(-1).h(-1))肾素浓度。肾素-血管紧张素系统的刺激可以解释氨氯地平缺乏肾脏保护作用。氨氯地平除氨氯地平外服用依那普利还可以减少蛋白尿。总之,米贝非尔对T型通道的阻滞作用可降低血压而不会刺激肾素-血管紧张素系统,因此可防止DOCA高血压大鼠的大部分肾小球损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号