首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension research: Official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension >Impact of global risk assessment on the evaluation of hypertensive patients treated by primary care physicians in Korea (A Nation-Wide, Multi-Center, Observational, Cross-Sectional, Epidemiologic Study to Evaluate the Proportion of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Korean hypertensive patients: WONDER study)
【24h】

Impact of global risk assessment on the evaluation of hypertensive patients treated by primary care physicians in Korea (A Nation-Wide, Multi-Center, Observational, Cross-Sectional, Epidemiologic Study to Evaluate the Proportion of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Korean hypertensive patients: WONDER study)

机译:全球风险评估对韩国初级保健医生治疗的高血压患者评估的影响(全国,多中心,观察,跨部门,流行病学研究,旨在评估韩国高血压患者心血管危险因素的比例:WONDER研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Global cardiovascular risk evaluation and stratification is essential to identify high-risk hypertensive patients. However, it is uncertain how often the strategy is executed in real clinical practice. We sought to evaluate whether global risk evaluation might change the risk stratification in Korean hypertensive patients treated by primary care physicians. A total of 3109 hypertensive patients were analyzed. The mean age was 62.3 +- 11.3 years, and 1502 (48.3%) of the participants were male. The global risk evaluation revealed that 1862 patients (59.9%) were classified as having high- or the very high-risk. High-risk patients were older and obese, and had a male predominance, a longer duration of hypertension and a low HDL-cholesterol. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP) were significantly higher in the high-risk group (P<0.0001). However, combination antihypertensive therapy was more common in the low-risk group (P= 0.0265). A total of 2155 patients (69.3%) were reclassified into the higher or the lower-risk group by performing additional tests. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, body mass index, BP, metabolic syndrome, left ventricular hypertrophy and chronic kidney disease were independent factors associated with risk reclassification with global risk evaluation. In conclusion, although the majority of hypertensive patients treated by the primary care physicians were in the high- or very high-risk group, their risk levels were not appropriately stratified. However, simple additional tests enhanced the risk evaluation of hypertensive patients. Accordingly, comprehensive cardiovascular risk stratification should be undertaken in all hypertensive patients.
机译:全球心血管风险评估和分层对于识别高危高血压患者至关重要。但是,尚不确定在实际的临床实践中多久执行一次该策略。我们试图评估整体风险评估是否会改变由初级保健医生治疗的韩国高血压患者的风险分层。总共分析了3109名高血压患者。平均年龄为62.3±11.3岁,其中1502(48.3%)名参与者为男性。全球风险评估显示,有1862名患者(59.9%)被分类为高风险或极高风险。高危患者年龄较大且肥胖,男性占主导地位,高血压病持续时间较长,HDL-胆固醇低。高危组的收缩压和舒张压(BP)显着较高(P <0.0001)。然而,在低危组中,联合降压治疗更为普遍(P = 0.0265)。通过进行额外的检查,总共2155名患者(69.3%)被重新划分为高风险或低风险组。在多因素logistic回归分析中,年龄,体重指数,血压,代谢综合征,左心室肥厚和慢性肾脏病是与整体风险评估中的风险重新分类相关的独立因素。总之,尽管大多数由初级保健医生治疗的高血压患者属于高风险或极高风险组,但他们的风险水平并未适当地分层。但是,简单的附加测试可增强高血压患者的风险评估。因此,所有高血压患者均应进行全面的心血管风险分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号