首页> 外文期刊>Human Biology: Official Publication of the Human Biology Council >How Much DNA Is Lost? Measuring DNA Loss of Short-Tandem-Repeat Length Fragments Targeted by the PowerPlex 16 (R) System Using the Qiagen MinElute Purification Kit
【24h】

How Much DNA Is Lost? Measuring DNA Loss of Short-Tandem-Repeat Length Fragments Targeted by the PowerPlex 16 (R) System Using the Qiagen MinElute Purification Kit

机译:丢失了多少DNA?使用Qiagen MinElute纯化试剂盒测量PowerPlex 16(R)系统靶向的短重复序列长度片段的DNA丢失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The success in recovering genetic profiles from aged and degraded biological samples is diminished by fundamental aspects of DNA extraction, as well as its long-term preservation, that are not well understood. While numerous studies have been conducted to determine whether one extraction method was superior to others, nearly all of them were initiated with no knowledge of the actual starting DNA quantity in the samples prior to extraction, so they ultimately compared the outcome of all methods relative to the best. Using quantitative PCR to estimate the copy count of synthetic standards before (i.e., "copies in") and after (i.e., "copies out") purification by the Qiagen MinElute PCR Purification Kit, we documented DNA loss within a pool of 16 diffferent-sized fragments ranging from 106 to 409 bp in length, corresponding to those targeted by the PowerPlex 16 System (Promega, Madison, WI). Across all standards from 104 to 107 copies/mu L, loss averaged between 21.75% and 60.56% (mean, 39.03%), which is not congruent with Qiagen's claim that 80% of 70 bp to 4 kb fragments are retained using this product (i.e., 20% loss). Our study also found no clear relationship either between DNA strand length and retention or between starting copy number and retention. This suggests that there is no molecule bias across the MinElute column membrane and highlights the need for manufacturers to clearly and accurately describe on what their claims are based, and should also encourage researchers to document DNA retention effficiencies of their own methods and protocols. Understanding how and where to reduce loss of molecules during extraction and purification will serve to generate clearer and more accurate data, which will enhance the utility of ancient and low-copy-number DNA as a tool for closing forensic cases or in reconstructing the evolutionary history of humans and other organisms.
机译:DNA提取及其长期保存的基本方面未能充分理解,因此无法从老化的和降解的生物样品中恢复遗传图谱的成功。尽管进行了大量研究来确定一种提取方法是否优于其他提取方法,但是几乎所有提取方法都是在不了解提取之前样品中实际起始DNA量的情况下开始的,因此最终他们比较了所有方法相对于提取方法的结果。最好的。使用定量PCR估算通过Qiagen MinElute PCR纯化试剂盒纯化之前(即“拷贝入”)和之后(即“拷贝出”)合成标准品的拷贝数,我们记录了16个不同样品池中的DNA损失。片段大小从106到409 bp不等,对应于PowerPlex 16系统(Promega,Madison,WI)靶向的片段。在从104到107拷贝/μL的所有标准液中,平均损失在21.75%至60.56%之间(平均39.03%),这与Qiagen的主张不符,后者声称使用该产品保留了70 bp至4 kb片段中的80%(即损失20%)。我们的研究还没有发现DNA链长度和保留之间或起始拷贝数和保留之间没有明确的关系。这表明MinElute柱膜上没有分子偏倚,并强调制造商需要清楚,准确地描述其主张的根据,并应鼓励研究人员记录其自身方法和规程的DNA保留效率。了解如何以及在哪里减少提取和纯化过程中分子的损失将有助于生成更清晰,更准确的数据,这将增强古代和低拷贝数DNA作为关闭法医案件或重建进化史的工具的效用人类和其他生物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号