首页> 外文期刊>Human movement science >How one breaks Fitts's Law and gets away with it: Moving further and faster involves more efficient online control
【24h】

How one breaks Fitts's Law and gets away with it: Moving further and faster involves more efficient online control

机译:如何打破菲茨定律并摆脱困境:进一步发展和加快步伐涉及更有效的在线控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adam, Mol, Pratt, and Fischer (2006) reported what they termed "a violation of Fitts's Law" - when participants aimed to targets in an array, movement times (MTs) to the last target location (highest index of difficulty (ID)) were shorter than predicted by Fitts's Law. Based on the results of subsequent studies in which placeholders were present either during planning and/or execution stages of the movements, it was suggested that the violation may emerge because of context-dependent changes in planning processes. The present study examined this planning explanation by conducting detailed kinematic analyses of movements. Participants performed aiming movements to sets of 3 targets in different placeholder arrays with different movement amplitudes. Consistent with previous Fitts's Law violation findings, MTs were not significantly longer for movements to the last versus middle target location. Interestingly, the pattern of peak limb velocities (typically associated with planning processes) did not mirror the changes in MTs. On the other hand, analyses of the effector's spatial variability during the movement suggested greater involvement of online control processes when the target was in the last position. Based on these results, we suggest that the Fitts' Law violation observed here occurred because of more efficient online control processes. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:Adam,Mol,Pratt和Fischer(2006)报告了他们所谓的“违反菲茨定律”的情况-参与者瞄准阵列中的目标时,到最后目标位置的移动时间(MT)(最高难度指数(ID)) )比Fitts定律所预测的短。根据后续研究的结果,在运动的计划和/或执行阶段中都存在占位符,因此有人提出,由于规划过程中上下文相关的更改,可能会出现违规情况。本研究通过对运动进行详细的运动学分析,检查了这一计划解释。参与者将目标移动到具有不同移动幅度的不同占位符阵列中的3个目标的集合。与先前的《费茨法则》(Fitts's Law)违规发现一致,移动到末尾目标位置和中间目标位置的MT不会明显更长。有趣的是,肢体峰值速度的模式(通常与计划过程相关)并未反映MT的变化。另一方面,对运动过程中效应器空间变异性的分析表明,当目标位于最后位置时,在线控制过程会更多地参与其中。根据这些结果,我们建议此处观察到的违反《菲茨法》的原因是更有效的在线控制流程。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号