...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Molecular Genetics >Defining haplotype blocks and tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.
【24h】

Defining haplotype blocks and tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.

机译:在人类基因组中定义单倍型区并标记单核苷酸多态性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent studies suggest that the genome is organized into blocks of haplotypes, and efforts to create a genome-wide haplotype map of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are already underway. Haplotype blocks are defined algorithmically and to date several algorithms have been proposed. However, little is known about their relative performance in real data or about the impact of allele frequencies and parameter choices on the detection of haplotype blocks and the markers that tag them. Here we present a formal comparison of two major algorithms, a linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based method and a dynamic programming algorithm (DPA), in three chromosomal regions differing in gene content and recombination rate. The two methods produced strikingly different results. DPA identified fewer and larger haplotype blocks as well as a smaller set of tag SNPs than the LD method. For both methods, the results were strongly dependent on the allele frequency. Decreasing the minor allele frequency led to an up to 3.7-fold increase in the number of haplotype blocks and tag SNPs. Definition of haploytpe blocks and tag SNPs was also sensitive to parameter changes, but the results could not be reconciled simply by parameter adjustment. These results show that two major methods for detecting haplotype blocks and tag SNPs can produce different results in the same data and that these results are sensitive to marker allele frequencies and parameter choices. More information is needed to guide the choice of method, marker allele frequencies, and parameters in the development of a haplotype map.
机译:最近的研究表明,基因组被组织成单倍型块,并且正在努力创建单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的全基因组单倍型图。单体型模块是通过算法定义的,迄今为止,已经提出了几种算法。但是,关于它们在真实数据中的相对性能或等位基因频率和参数选择对单倍型基因组及其标记的检测的影响知之甚少。在这里,我们在基因含量和重组率不同的三个染色体区域中,对两种主要算法(基于连锁不平衡(LD)的方法和动态编程算法(DPA))进行了正式的比较。两种方法产生了截然不同的结果。与LD方法相比,DPA识别出的单倍型模块越来越少,标签SNP数量也越来越少。对于这两种方法,结果均强烈取决于等位基因频率。降低次要等位基因频率导致单倍型模块和标签SNP数量最多增加3.7倍。 haploytpe块和标签SNP的定义对参数更改也很敏感,但结果不能仅通过参数调整来协调。这些结果表明,检测单倍型模块和标签SNP的两种主要方法可以在同一数据中产生不同的结果,并且这些结果对标记等位基因频率和参数选择敏感。在单倍型图谱的开发中,需要更多信息来指导方法,标记等位基因频率和参数的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号