...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Heredity >Cochran-Armitage test versus logistic regression in the analysis of genetic association studies
【24h】

Cochran-Armitage test versus logistic regression in the analysis of genetic association studies

机译:遗传关联研究分析中的Cochran-Armitage检验与逻辑回归

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: The Cochran-Armitage trend test based on the linear regression model has become a standard procedure for association testing in case-control studies. In contrast, the logistic regression model is generally used for estimating effect sizes. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach that allows for association testing and parameter estimation by means of the same statistic. Methods/Results: The trend test is recommendable as a test of no association between genotype and risk of disease. It is a two-sample test for differences between cases and controls with respect to the average number of risk alleles occurring in the genotype of an individual. We argue that this difference is not of primary interest in genetic association studies. It should be replaced with the disease odds ratio, which can be assessed under both cohort sampling and case-control sampling. Conclusion: The Cochran-Armitage trend test should be replaced by the Wald statistic from a logistic regression model for hypothesis testing and estimation in genetic association studies.
机译:目的:基于线性回归模型的Cochran-Armitage趋势检验已成为病例对照研究中关联检验的标准程序。相反,逻辑回归模型通常用于估计效应量。本文的目的是提出一种方法,该方法允许通过相同的统计信息进行关联测试和参数估计。方法/结果:趋势测试推荐作为基因型和疾病风险之间没有关联的测试。这是一项针对两个样本的测试,用于针对个体基因型中出现的风险等位基因的平均数量,对病例和对照之间的差异进行评估。我们认为这种差异并不是遗传关联研究的主要兴趣。应该用疾病几率代替,该几率可以在队列抽样和病例对照抽样下进行评估。结论:Cochran-Armitage趋势检验应由逻辑关联模型的逻辑检验模型的逻辑回归模型中的Wald统计量代替。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号