...
首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Mechanical thinning of peach and apple trees reduces labor input and increases fruit size
【24h】

Mechanical thinning of peach and apple trees reduces labor input and increases fruit size

机译:桃树和苹果树的机械疏伐减少了劳动力投入并增加了果实的大小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hand thinning is a necessary but costly management practice in peach (Prunus persica) production. Organic apple (Malus xdomestica) production also may require hand thinning to adjust crop load. Mechanical devices to aid in thinning have been developed, but none has proven highly efficient and capable of completely replacing hand thinning. Narrow canopy training systems and novel peach tree growth habits offer new, opportunities to examine mechanical methods for thinning peach and apple trees. Our studies evaluated mechanical thinning devices on peach and organically grown apple trees. In 2005 and 2006, a U.S Department of Agriculture-designed spiked-drum shaker was used to thin pillar (columnar) peach trees at 52 to 55 days after full bloom. The drum shaker, driven at two different speeds in the orchard, reduced crop load an average of 58% and follow-up hand thinning time by 50%, and increased fruit size by 9% at harvest compared with conventional hand-thinned or nonthinned control trees in 2005. In 2006, the shaker was driven at one speed but operated at two different frequencies. At 260 cycles/minute, the drum shaker removed more fruit and reduced crop load to a greater extent than when operated at 180 cycles/minute, however, fruit size at harvest did not differ between the two operating frequencies. The drum shaker reduced follow-up hand thinning time between 54% and 81%. Horticultural and economic evaluations of the drum shaker and/or a German-designed blossom string thinner were conducted in 2007 in four commercial peach orchards trained to a perpendicular V or quad V system and an organic apple block trained to a narrow vertical axis system. Mechanical thinners reduced peach crop load by an average of 36%, decreased follow-up hand thinning time by 20% to 42%, and increased fruit in higher market value size categories by 35%. The net economic impact of mechanical thinning versus hand thinning alone ranged from $175/ha to $1966/ha. Mechanical thinning at 20% full bloom resulted in more fruit in the large size categories (2.75 inches in diameter and larger) than thinning at 80% full bloom. Detailed counts of flowers on branches with different orientations indicated that pruning may be adjusted to improve thinner performance. The string thinner effectively thinned dwarf apple trees trained to a vertical axis system in a certified organic orchard, resulting in a reduction in hand thinning time and an increase in fruit size. Based on our tests, mechanical thinning appears to be a promising technique for supplementing hand thinning in apple and peach trees.
机译:在桃(Prunus persica)生产中,手稀疏是必要但昂贵的管理实践。有机苹果(Malus xdomestica)的生产也可能需要手稀以调整农作物负荷。已经开发出有助于薄化的机械装置,但是没有一种被证明是高效的并且能够完全替代手工薄化。狭窄的树冠训练系统和新颖的桃树生长习性为检验用于疏化桃树和苹果树的机械方法提供了新的机会。我们的研究评估了桃树和有机种植的苹果树上的机械稀疏设备。在2005年和2006年,美国农业部设计的穗鼓式振动筛被用于在盛开后52到55天使桃树(柱状)稀疏。与传统的手工稀疏或不稀疏对照相比,在果园中以两种不同速度驱动的鼓式振动器平均减少了58%的农作物负荷,并减少了后续手动疏果时间,并且使收获时的果实大小增加了9%。树木在2005年。2006年,振动筛以一种速度驱动,但以两种不同的频率运行。与以180个循环/分钟运行时相比,以260个循环/分钟的速度运行时,鼓式振动筛去除了更多的水果,并减轻了农作物的负荷,但是,两个操作频率之间收获时的果实大小没有差异。鼓式振动器将后续手的稀疏时间减少了54%至81%。鼓式振动器和/或德国设计的开花串稀释剂的园艺和经济评估于2007年在接受垂直V或Quad V系统训练的四个商业桃园和经过垂直轴狭窄系统训练的有机苹果块上进行。机械稀释剂平均使桃农作物减产36%,将后续手间苗时间减少20%至42%,在较高市场价值的品种中,水果减少了35%。机械薄化与手工薄化的净经济影响范围从$ 175 / ha到$ 1966 / ha。在大尺寸类别(直径2.75英寸和更大)下,机械地疏花在20%盛开时比在80%盛开时疏果更多。对不同方向的树枝上的花朵的详细计数表明,可以调整修剪以改善更薄的性能。细绳细化剂有效地细化了经过认证的有机果园中垂直轴系统训练的矮化苹果树,从而减少了手间苗时间并增加了果实大小。根据我们的测试,机械稀疏似乎是补充苹果和桃树中手工稀疏的有前途的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号