首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Capillary Mats for Maintenance of Plants in the Retail Nursery
【24h】

Capillary Mats for Maintenance of Plants in the Retail Nursery

机译:零售苗圃中用于植物维护的毛细管垫

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Capillary mats and overhead sprinkler irrigation were used in a simulated retail environment to maintain annual and perennial plants in containers for various time periods during summer and winter. Combining the results from both seasons, four specieswith dense canopies had larger canopy sizes when maintained on the capillary mats, three species requiring more drainage had larger canopies with overhead irrigation, and five species were unaffected by irrigation systems. Substrate electrical conductivity was higher for some species in winter for plants on capillary mats, conserving fertilizer compared with overhead irrigation. Most species tolerated either irrigation system well. Water application was 71% less in summer and 62% less in winter to maintain plants on capillary mats compared with overhead irrigation. An economic analysis compared the investment required for setup and maintenance of plants in a retail situation using hand watering, overhead sprinkler, or capillary mat irrigation. The partial budget indicates that capillary mats are a labor-saving alternative to hand watering hi a retail nursery and will compensate for the higher initial investment within less than 1 year. The overhead sprinklers are the most cost-effective system of the three because of less costly initial set-up and maintenance than the capillary mats; however, they are not a true alternative to hand watering in a retail situation because they interfere with customer traffic and worker activities.
机译:在模拟的零售环境中使用了毛细管垫和架空喷水灌溉,以在夏季和冬季的不同时间段中将一年生和多年生植物维持在容器中。结合两个季节的结果,有四个冠层浓密的树种保持在毛细管垫上时,冠层尺寸更大;三个需要更多排水的树种具有较高的冠层灌溉冠层,而五个树种不受灌溉系统的影响。与高架灌溉相比,冬季某些物种在毛细管垫上的基质电导率更高,从而节省了肥料。大多数种类对两种灌溉系统的耐受性都很好。与高架灌溉相比,夏季在保持毛细管垫的条件下,夏季的用水量减少了71%,冬季减少了62%。一项经济分析比较了零售情况下使用手动浇水,高架喷头或毛细管垫灌溉设置和维护工厂所需的投资。部分预算表明,在零售苗圃中,毛毡垫可以代替人工浇水,省力,并且可以在不到1年的时间内补偿较高的初始投资。高架喷头是这三种中成本效益最高的系统,因为其初始安装和维护成本比毛细管垫要低。但是,在零售情况下,它们不是真正的手动浇水替代品,因为它们会干扰客户的交通和工人的活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号