...
首页> 外文期刊>HVAC&R research >Infiltration effects on residential pollutant concentrations for continuous and intermittent mechanical ventilation approaches
【24h】

Infiltration effects on residential pollutant concentrations for continuous and intermittent mechanical ventilation approaches

机译:连续和间歇机械通风方式对居民污染物浓度的渗透作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The prevailing residential ventilation standard in North America, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 62.2, specifies volumetric airflow requirements as a function of the overall size of the home and the number of bedrooms; assumes a fixed, minimal amount of infiltration; and requires mechanical ventilation to achieve the remainder. The standard allows for infiltration credits and intermittent ventilation patterns that can be shown to provide comparable performance. Whole-house ventilation methods have a substantial effect on time-varying indoor pollutant concentrations. If alternatives specified by Standard 62.2, such as intermittent ventilation, are used, short-term-pollutant concentrations could exceed acute health standards, even if chronic health standards are met. A methodology is presented for comparing ASHRAE- and non-ASHRAE-specified ventilation scenarios on relative indoor pollutant concentrations. Numerical modeling is used to compare the maximum time-averaged concentrations for acute exposure relevant (1-h, 8-h, 24-h) and chronic exposure relevant (1-year) time periods for four different ventilation scenarios in six climates with a range of normalized leakage values. The results suggest that long-term concentrations are the most important metric for assessing the effectiveness of whole-house ventilation systems in meeting exposure standards and that, if chronic health exposure standards are met, acute standards will also be met.
机译:北美现行的住宅通风标准,即美国供暖,制冷和空调工程师协会(ASHRAE)标准62.2,规定了根据房屋整体大小和卧室数量而定的体积气流需求;假定渗透量是固定的,最小的;并需要机械通风以达到剩余的效果。该标准考虑了渗透性能和间歇通风模式,可以证明具有可比的性能。全屋通风方法对随时间变化的室内污染物浓度具有重大影响。如果使用标准62.2规定的替代方法,例如间歇通风,即使满足慢性健康标准,短期污染物浓度也可能超过急性健康标准。提出了一种方法,用于比较ASHRAE和非ASHRAE指定的通风场景相对于室内污染物的浓度。数值模型用于比较六个气候下四种不同通风情景下的急性暴露相关时间(1-h,8h,24h)和慢性暴露相关时间(1年)的最大时间平均浓度。标准化泄漏值范围。结果表明,长期浓度是评估全屋通风系统达到暴露标准的有效性的最重要指标,并且,如果满足慢性健康暴露标准,也将达到急性标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号