首页> 外文期刊>Hospital pharmacy. >Original Article Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy After Cardioembolic Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter
【24h】

Original Article Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy After Cardioembolic Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter

机译:房颤或扑动引起的心脏栓塞性中风后抗栓治疗的原始分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Guidelines recommend that all patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of is-chemic stroke should receive an anticoagulant. Prior analyses show that warfarin is underutilized in most populations.Objective: To examine the use of antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter during the index hospitalization for acute, ischemic stroke. Methods: Retrospective electronic medical record review of 200 patients treated at a tertiary care hospital with a primary ICD-9 code for ischemic stroke and a secondary ICD-9 code for atrial fibrillation or flutter. Exclusion criteria were active bleeding, pregnancy, age less than 18, preexisting warfarin allergy, or dabigatran use.Results: Fifty-two percent of patients received at least one dose of warfarin during the index hospitalization. There was no relationship between CHADS2 score and likelihood of receiving warfarin (P > .05). There was no significant difference in adverse event rate in patients receiving warfarin compared to those receiving aspirin (3.8%vs9.1%;P=.14), but the rate of hemorrhagic transformation was lower in patients receiving warfarin (1% vs 7%; P = .03). The composite of hemorrhagic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation was significantly lower in patients receiving bridging therapy (0% vs 11%; P = .03). Sixteen patients were readmitted for stroke within 3 months of discharge. Ten were readmitted for ischemic stroke, 3 for hemorrhagic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation, and 3 for systemic bleeding. Ten patients (62.5%) were receiving warfarin at re-admission, but only one of these patients had a therapeutic INR.Conclusions: Warfarin was underutilized as secondary stroke prophylaxis in these high-risk patients. Bridging therapy appeared to be safe and was not associated with an increase in adverse events.
机译:背景:指南建议所有患有房颤和有缺血性中风病史的患者均应接受抗凝治疗。先前的分析表明,华法林在大多数人群中并未得到充分利用。目的:研究在急性缺血性卒中指标住院期间房颤或扑动患者中抗凝和抗凝治疗的应用。方法:回顾性分析电子病历,对在一家三级医院接受治疗的200例患者进行诊断,这些患者的主要ICD-9代码代表缺血性卒中,次要的ICD-9代码代表心房颤动或扑动。排除标准为活动性出血,妊娠,年龄小于18岁,已存在华法林过敏或使用达比加群。结果:52%的患者在指标住院期间接受了至少一剂华法林。 CHADS2评分与接受华法林的可能性之间没有关系(P> .05)。与接受阿司匹林的患者相比,接受华法林的患者的不良事件发生率没有显着差异(3.8%vs9.1%; P = .14),但是接受华法林的患者的出血转化率较低(1%比7%) ; P = .03)。接受桥接治疗的患者出血性中风或出血性转化的复合物显着降低(0%比11%; P = .03)。出院后3个月内有16名患者再次中风。缺血性中风再入院10例,出血性中风或出血性转化入院3例,全身性出血入院3例。再入院时有10例患者(62.5%)接受了华法林治疗,但其中只有1例具有治疗性INR。结论:这些高危患者中,华法林没有被充分利用作为继发性卒中的预防措施。桥接疗法似乎是安全的,并且与不良事件的增加无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号