...
首页> 外文期刊>HPAC engineering >Requirement for Fire and Smoke Dampers in Shafts Still Being Debated at Press Time
【24h】

Requirement for Fire and Smoke Dampers in Shafts Still Being Debated at Press Time

机译:截至发稿时,有关竖井中防火防烟的要求仍在辩论中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At June 2008 hearings for the final action on the 2008 edition of the Life Safety Code, a proposal in NFPA 90A to require fire and smoke dampers in shafts was voted down by the NFPA membership. The primary opponents of this proposal were members of the influential Health Care Section, whose objection to the added requirement was cost of installation and maintenance. Even though three separate Technical Committees (TCs) since 2002 had voted overwhelmingly to approve the proposal, the proposal was defeated in a 116-81 floor vote against the requirement. When resubmitted to the TC after the hearings, again the TC upheld its previous recommendation to require fire and smoke dampers in shafts. Since there was no consensus between the voting membership and the TC, the Standards Council returned the language on fire dampers in shafts in the 2008 version of NFPA 90A to that which was found in the 2002 version.
机译:在2008年6月针对《 2008年生命安全守则》采取最终行动的听证会上,NFPA成员否决了NFPA 90A中要求在井道中安装防火和排烟阀的提案。这项提议的主要反对者是有影响力的卫生保健科的成员,他们反对增加的要求是安装和维护费用。尽管自2002年以来三个独立的技术委员会(TC)以压倒性多数票通过了该提案,但该提案还是以116票对81票的反对票被否决。在听证会之后重新提交给技术委员会时,技术委员会再次维持其先前的建议,即要求在井道安装防火和排烟阀。由于有投票权的成员与TC之间没有达成共识,因此标准委员会将NFPA 90A的2008版中的竖井防火阀的语言恢复到2002版中的语言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号