首页> 外文期刊>History of the human sciences >Reflections on the ruins of Athens and Rome: Derrida and Simmel on temporality, life and death
【24h】

Reflections on the ruins of Athens and Rome: Derrida and Simmel on temporality, life and death

机译:关于雅典和罗马废墟的反思:德里达和西梅尔关于时间,生与死的信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent publication of the translation of Jacques Derrida's Athens, Still Remains, a small volume of photographs and commentary, affords an opportunity to probe Derrida's reflections on death and therefore on life as well. Looking at photographs and objects of everyday life, Derrida emphasizes the deferred yet certain nature of death and the way in which this deferral opens the opportunity to devote ourselves to life. His grounding of his philosophical and deconstructionist argument in contemplation of material fragments (the photographs of ruins and scenes from the recent past of Athens) invites a comparison with the writing of sociologist Georg Simmel on ruins, time and death. Both writers attempt to discover practices of survival, the techne of affirming life in the face of death. For both of them these practices are sociological as well as philosophical, individual as well as collective, and aesthetic as well as intellectual. While their reflections thematically converge, their strategies for the affirmation of life are not identical, and we contrast Derrida's approach, rooted in a concept of being in the world and a connection to others, to Simmel's analysis which is focused on the role of culture and the force of the human spirit. Reconstructing a conversation between Derrida and Simmel and examining their intellectual rapprochement deepen our thinking about temporality and death as we confront the question 'How are we to live?'
机译:最近出版的雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的雅典译本《静物依然》(Sstill Remains),少量的照片和评论,为探讨德里达对死亡以及生命的思考提供了机会。通过观察日常生活中的照片和物体,德里达强调了死亡的延缓而又确定的本质以及延缓死亡的方式为献身于生命提供了机会。他以哲学和解构主义论点为基础来思考物质碎片(雅典近代的废墟和场景照片),这与社会学家格奥尔格·西梅尔(Georg Simmel)关于废墟,时间和死亡的著作进行了比较。两位作家都试图发现生存的实践,即面对死亡来肯定生命的技巧。对他们来说,这些实践都是社会学的,哲学的,个人的,集体的,美学的和知识的。尽管他们的思考在主题上趋于一致,但他们对生命的肯定策略并不相同,并且我们将德里达的方法植根于存在于世界中并与他人联系的概念与西梅尔的分析方法进行了对比,后者的研究重点是文化和文化的作用。人类精神的力量。当我们面对“我们如何生活?”这个问题时,重建德里达和西梅尔之间的对话并研究他们的智力和睦就加深了我们对暂时性和死亡的思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号