首页> 外文期刊>History of the human sciences >Debt, consumption and freedom: Social scientific representations of consumer credit in Anglo-America
【24h】

Debt, consumption and freedom: Social scientific representations of consumer credit in Anglo-America

机译:债务,消费与自由:英美消费者信贷的社会科学表现形式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The article explores a range of social scientific representations of credit and debt in the United States and Britain and how these have been organized around the problem of freedom. On the one hand, credit is projected as productive, embodying and securing liberal values of individual autonomy and self-determination. On the other, debt is portrayed as consumptive, ensnaring the individual, subverting her or his will and undermining the capacity for self-determination. The classic cultural injunction against consumer borrowing is captured under the rubric of the Puritan ethic which portrays indebtedness as contrary to the values of individual freedom and autonomy; however, it is shown here how the meanings attached to credit and debt have always been ambiguous in practice. Over the 20th century, and continuing today, a number of economic writers have attempted to legitimize the development of consumer credit by demonstrating how it contributes towards freedom and security. However, it is shown how these accounts shift in response to changing economic discourses as well as credit's growing pervasiveness. In contrast, sociological writers have tended to criticize the accumulation of debt as damaging to both individual autonomy and societal welfare. Again, these accounts also manifest a notable change in emphasis over time in response to shifting constructions of the problem of social change. Finally, recent empirical work is drawn upon to demonstrate the ways in which freedom itself can be a contingent and contextual element in the production of consumer credit.
机译:本文探讨了美国和英国的一系列关于信用和债务的社会科学表示形式,以及如何围绕自由问题进行组织。一方面,信用被认为是生产性的,体现并确保了个人自治和自决的自由价值观。另一方面,债务被描述为消耗性的,使个人陷入困境,颠覆了他或他的意志,破坏了自决的能力。反对消费者借贷的经典文化禁令是在清教徒伦理学的原理下体现的,该学说描绘了债务,与个人自由和自治的价值背道而驰;但是,这里显示了信贷和债务所附带的含义在实践中一直是模棱两可的。在20世纪并持续到今天,许多经济作家试图通过证明消费信贷对自由和安全的贡献来使消费信贷的发展合法化。但是,它显示了这些帐户如何响应不断变化的经济言论以及信贷日益普及而转移。相反,社会学作家倾向于批评债务的积累既损害了个人自主权,也损害了社会福利。同样,这些说明也显示出随着时间的推移,随着社会变革问题的结构不断变化,人们在重点上的显着变化。最后,最近的实证研究证明了自由本身可以成为消费者信贷生产中偶然性和情境因素的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号