首页> 外文期刊>HNO >Sauer's binaural number test in noise. Significance in expertise [Beidohriger Zahlentest im St?rger?usch nach Sauer. Stellenwert in der Begutachtung]
【24h】

Sauer's binaural number test in noise. Significance in expertise [Beidohriger Zahlentest im St?rger?usch nach Sauer. Stellenwert in der Begutachtung]

机译:绍尔的双耳数测试在噪音中。专业知识的重要性[根据Sauer,在烦人的噪音中进行双耳数测试。评估中的状态]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. For the determination of speech intelligibility in the expertise of hearing loss, the Freiburg speech test (number test and monosyllable test) is recommended in the Federal Republic of Germany. In the former German Democratic Republic, Sauer's binaural number test with 70 dB background noise ("beidohriger Zahlentest", BZT) was a standard element in expert opinions and was used in the calculation of bodily injury ("K?rperschaden"). In the current practice, a hearing test in noise is still lacking. The present study analyzes whether and to what degree the impairment ("Grad der Sch?digungsfolgen", GdS) changes when also considering Sauer's test.Material and methods. In a collective of 78 patients with hearing loss (66 patients with high-frequency hearing loss and 12 patients with pancochlear hearing loss) and 22 normal hearing controls, the following audiometric measurements were conducted: pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry (Freiburg speech test), free field audiometry with and without noise, and Sauer's test. Subsequently, the hearing loss for both sides was calculated taking into consideration the values obtained with and without Sauer's test, and the respective GdS was determined.Results. Patients with high-frequency hearing loss and pancochlear hearing loss had a trend for higher GdS (approximately 2 and 5%, respectively), compared to the established algorithm without the use of hearing tests in noise. However, neither the Mann-Whitney U-test nor the Bland-Altman analysis yielded relevant differences between the two methods to calculate the GdS.Conclusion. The routine implementation of Sauer's test in the expertise of hearing loss cannot be recommended, since no relevant change in the GdS can be expected. This is especially true for high-frequency hearing loss. In pancochlear hearing loss, use of Sauer's test can be considered if problems concerning hearing in situations with background noise are present-at least until more advanced hearing tests optimized for use in noise have been integrated into the tables for GdS calculation.
机译:目的。为了确定听力损失专家的语音清晰度,建议在德意志联邦共和国进行弗莱堡语音测试(数字测试和单音节测试)。在前德意志民主共和国,绍尔的双耳数测试(背景噪音为70 dB)(“ beidohriger Zahlentest”,BZT)是专家意见中的标准要素,并用于计算人身伤害(“ K?rperschaden”)。在当前的实践中,仍然缺少对噪声的听力测试。当考虑Sauer检验时,本研究分析了损伤(Grad der Sch?digungsfolgen,GdS)是否以及在何种程度上改变。材料和方法。在78名听力损失患者(66位高频听力损失和12位全耳蜗听力损失)和22位正常听力对照患者的集体中,进行了以下听力测定:纯音测听,语音测听(弗莱堡语音测试) ,有无噪声的自由场测听法以及Sauer的测试。随后,考虑使用和不使用Sauer检验获得的值来计算双方的听力损失,并确定各自的GdS。结果。与没有在噪声中使用听力测试的既定算法相比,高频听力损失和全耳听力丧失的患者有更高的GdS趋势(分别约为2%和5%)。但是,Mann-Whitney U检验和Bland-Altman分析都没有在计算GdS的两种方法之间产生相关差异。不能建议以听力损失方面的专业知识常规执行Sauer测试,因为预计GdS不会发生相关变化。对于高频听力损失尤其如此。在全耳蜗性听力损失中,如果存在与背景噪声有关的听力问题,则可以考虑使用Sauer检验-至少直到将针对噪声优化的更先进的听力测试集成到表格中进行GdS计算为止。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号